Objectives:
The objective of this study was to compare the rate of prophylaxis between severe hemophilia B and severe hemophilia A patients.
Methods:
A retrospective cross sectional study was conducted using a large US specialty pharmacy dispensing database and 16 months of data (January 2013 to April 2014). Patients with ICD-9 diagnosis codes 286.0 (hemophilia A) or 286.1 (hemophilia B), who filled a prescription for any FVIII or FIX product were included. Prophylaxis patients were defined by having at least one prophylaxis dispensing record, while on-demand patients were defined by those without any prophylaxis dispensing record during the study period. Descriptive statistics were used to report patient characteristics and the percent of prophylaxis and on-demand patients by hemophilia A and B. Logistic regression was used to compare the rate of prophylaxis between severe hemophilia A and severe hemophilia B, while controlling for age.
Results:
A total of 1565 hemophilia A patients and 376 hemophilia B patients were included in the analysis. A higher percentage of hemophilia A patients had severe hemophilia than hemophilia B patients (63.1% vs. 45.0%, P<0.0001). The mean age for severe hemophilia patients was 24.6 and 22.8 years, respectively (P=0.04). Overall, more severe hemophilia A patients were on prophylaxis compared to severe hemophilia B patients (80.3% vs 73.4%, P=0.04)). When controlling for age, severe hemophilia A patients were significantly more likely to be on prophylaxis compared to severe hemophilia B patients (OR=1.63, P=0.02).
Conclusion:
Severe hemophilia B patients were less likely to be prescribed prophylaxis compared to severe hemophilia A patients. Efforts should be made so the benefits of prophylaxis are extended to more hemophilia B patients.