Background/Aim:
Little data exist, especially for adolescents and young adults (AYAs), about the relationship between adherence to prescribed hemophilia treatment regimens and chronic pain (CP).
Methods:
A convenience sample of hemophiliacs aged 13-25 completed an IRB-approved, online survey addressing regimen-specific adherence and CP between April through December of 2012. Adherence was assessed for prophylactic (VERITAS-Pro) and on- demand (VERITAS-PRN) participants. VERITAS scores range from 24 (most adherent) to 120 (least adherent). CP was measured using the revised Faces Pain Scale (FPS-R). CP was dichotomized as high (‘moderate’ to ‘worst pain possible,’ i.e., ≥4) or low (‘mild’ or ‘no pain,’ (i.e., <4). Multivariable, parsimonious logistic regression models assessed factors associated with high vs low CP levels. Separate models were constructed to evaluate a combined VERITAS score among prophylactic and on-demand patients and the VERITAS- Pro score among prophylactic patients only. Small sample size precluded analysis of on- demand (only) participants.
Results:
Ninety-three AYAs participated. Mild patients (n=13) were excluded. Of the remaining 80 participants (79 male), 91% had severe disease, 86% infused prophylactically, and 91% had Hemophilia A. Fifty-one percent were aged 13-17, most were white (76%), non- Hispanic (88%), and never married (93%). The majority (94%) had some type of health insurance.
Mean VERITAS-Pro (n=69) and PRN (n=11) scores were 49.6 ±12.9 (range 25-78) and 51.0 ±11.6 (range 35-74), respectively. CP was reported as high for 35% of respondents (36% for prophylactic vs 27% for on-demand, p=.74). Mean VERITAS-Pro scores for those with high and low CP were 53.6 ±12.3 vs 47.4 ±12.9, p=.05. VERITAS-PRN scores were similar across CP status. Logistic regression analysis revealed that for each 10-point reduction (increase in adherence) in the combined VERITAS score (Pro and PRN) there was a 35% (OR=0.65; 95%CI=0.44, 0.96; p=.03) reduction in the odds of having high CP. Among prophylactic respondents: for each 10-point reduction in the VERITAS-Pro score there was a 39% (OR=0.61; 95%CI=0.39, 0.96; p=.03) reduction in the odds of having high CP and compared to whites, non-whites were 4.42 (95%CI: 1.21, 16.1; p=.02) times as likely to report high CP.