Research Studies

Objective:

This study assessed current clinical practices of clinicians related to hemophilia treatment guidelines to identify knowledge, competency, practice gaps and barriers to optimal care of patients with inhibitors.

Methods:

A continuing medical education (CME)-certified clinical practice assessment survey was developed comprising 24 knowledge- and case-based, multiple-choice questions. The survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and confidence with regard to newly-developed hemophilia treatment guidelines emphasizing integrated care for patients with inhibitors, and the application of these guideline-based recommendations. The survey launched on the Medscape Education website on December 5, 2016 with participant responses collected through January 26, 2017. The data sample includes responses from 170 physicians who participated during the study period.

Summary of Results (n=170 physicians):

Responses to questions on the screening for, and management of, inhibitor formation in patients with hemophilia undergoing prophylaxis, showed that: the majority of hematologists/oncologists correctly identified the factors that increase risk of inhibitor formation (71%), while less than half of pediatricians did so (46%); when asked regarding exposure days (EDs) and the formation of inhibitors, half of hematologists/oncologists correctly identified within 50 EDs, while only 25% of pediatricians did so; and both hematologists/oncologists (21%) and pediatricians (28%) incorrectly identified how often a patient should be tested for inhibitors. When surveyed specifically regarding immune tolerance induction (ITI), a slight majority of hematologists/oncologists and pediatricians correctly chose the time frame during which to initiate ITI (55% and 51%, respectively), and 50% of hematologists/oncologists knew the most powerful predictor of ITI success, while only 42% of pediatricians did so; only 14% of hematologists/oncologists and 4% of pediatricians knew that there is no optimal rFVIII to initiate for ITI; only 10% of hematologists/oncologists and 8% of pediatricians knew that there is not optimal dose of rFVIII to initiate for ITI.

Conclusions:

The need for further education was observed for the following topics: best practices in the integrative care of patients using evidence-based guidelines and recommendations; current and emerging clinical data guiding acute and prophylactic management; risk factors for the development of inhibitors during prophylaxis; screening and management of inhibitor formation, including ITI. Further educational efforts tailored to address these gaps are warranted.

Objectives:

To better understand what symptoms beyond bleeds are experienced, as well as the depth of impact of these symptoms and how they uniquely impact people living with hemophilia on a daily basis. Additionally, the study aims to better understand patients’ satisfaction with current treatments in addressing their hemophilia needs.

Design/Method:

An email invitation was sent to all U.S. members affiliated with hemophilia A of MyHemophiliaTeam, a social network of people diagnosed with or caring for someone with hemophilia. 54 members responded to a 24 question survey between April 19 and May 1, 2017.

Results:

Hemophilia had a significant negative impact on the day-to-day life of adults (72%) and children (52%). Pain was the most broadly and acutely experienced symptom: 60% of adults and 28% of caregivers felt that pain had a major impact on their lives and 33% of adults and 25% of caregivers considered mobility to be significantly impacted by hemophilia.

For adults, both pain and mobility limitations impacted sleep (71% and 45%, respectively), being able to perform chores (71% and 65%), and the ability to work (48% and 45%). For children, these conditions impacted school attendance (61% and 58%) and participation in high impact activities like running or playing soccer (56% and 75%).

Depression and anxiety were also common symptoms that impacted sleep across adults (71%, 61%) and children (60%, 55%). Adults most commonly reported feeling negative ones: stress (38%), fatigue (38%) and annoyance (35%).

81% of adults and 86% of caregivers were extremely or very satisfied with current treatment. However, needs beyond treating bleeds are currently not being met. Few felt their pain was adequately addressed by current therapies (74% of adults and 57% of children reported no relief). Mobility impairment issues were also not being adequately addressed. Time spent on treatment impacted people with hemophilia (39% of adults and 43% of children, respectively were not satisfied with the frequency of treatment).

Background:

While people with hemophilia are known to suffer from bleeding, numerous concomitant symptoms also burden these patients, including pain, mobility impairments, depression, and anxiety. These symptoms can have a significant impact on quality of life, limiting work and school attendance, causing social withdrawal, and encouraging inactivity. Additionally, available treatment options can sometimes fall short in treating the totality of hemophilia symptoms.

Conclusions:

People with hemophilia have many challenges beyond bleeds that are not currently being well addressed. This is particularly true for the pain experienced. As such, a more holistic approach to treating hemophilia beyond bleeds would be beneficial to patients living with hemophilia. Additionally, therapies that reduce the need and frequency for treatment could potentially lower the burden of disease.

Objective:

My Life, Our Future (MLOF) seeks to advance understanding of hemophilia by developing the MLOF Research Repository, a resource for use in scientific study. To strengthen the database and improve clinical care for females, MLOF expanded in 2016 to collect data and samples from potential and confirmed carriers.

Methods:

MLOF is a collaboration between the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) (educates HCPs, collects and protects genetic data, manages ATHNdataset, manages research review committee), Bloodworks Northwest (BWNW) (performs genetic testing and analysis, manages MLOF Research Repository), National Hemophilia Foundation (educates patients and the community), and Bioverativ (provides scientific collaboration and sponsorship). Patients enrolled in MLOF can contribute their de-identified clinical information and specimens (DNA, RNA, plasma and serum) to the MLOF Research Repository. The patients’ hemophilic genetic data (F8 or F9 variant) and specimens are stored at BWNW and their clinical data in the ATHNdataset. For carrier project participants, an ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool score is determined, and for confirmed carriers factor levels are obtained and recorded in ATHN Clinical Manager. Upon enrollment of 5,000 participants, the MLOF Research Repository was opened to U.S-based investigators in February 2017. Investigators were encouraged to partner with a participating hemophilia treatment center (HTC) on projects for clinical translational support. An independent, international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to review research proposals, evaluating project feasibility, scientific merit and potential contribution to the bleeding disorders community.

Summary:

To date, 97 HTCs are actively participating in MLOF and have enrolled 8,246 patients. Of those, 83% (6,857), including 723 confirmed carriers, have consented to research. The samples of 427 additional females consenting to research are pending evaluation; 1,643 females have participated in MLOF. The first MLOF Research Repository cycle received 9 Letters of Intent and 7 were chosen for full proposal review. The final selection of studies will be announced to the community in June 2017.

Conclusions:

Combining and analyzing genetic and clinical data via this database may allow researchers to solve unmet needs in patients with hemophilia, including understanding inhibitor development, bleeding severity or aiding in identifying new therapeutic targets. By considering molecular drivers of disease and genetic variability, this approach could lead to more individualized treatment through advancement of precision medicine. Global expansion of the MLOF Research Repository is planned for 2018. Carrier testing may help females manage their bleeding disorder and may aid in family planning. Related to research, females provide a unique control group for males with hemophilia on natural history, modifier genes inside and outside the coagulation system, and epigenetic factors affecting outcomes.

Objective:

Patients with hereditary bleeding disorders have been included in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of sofosbuvir (SOF), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) as well as in a dedicated study (n = 120) in this patient population. This integrated analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of SOF-based regimens in HCV-infected patients with hereditary bleeding disorders.

Methods:

HCV-infected patients with a medical history of a hereditary bleeding disorder who participated in a SOF-based Phase 2 or 3 study were included in this pooled analysis. Medical history term(s) used to identify patients with bleeding disorders included variations of Hemophilia A or B, Von Willebrand’s Disease, Factor Deficiencies, or conditions associated with hemophilia.

Summary:

A total of 201 patients (74 GT1, 10% GT2, 14% GT3, 2% GT4, <1% GT5) with bleeding disorders were identified across 19 studies. The majority were male (91%), Caucasian (82%), IL28B non-CC (70%), HCV treatment-naïve (55%), and without cirrhosis (74%). Hemophilia A (65%) and B (26%) were the most common bleeding disorders. SVR12 results are shown in the below table by treatment regimen and genotype. The most frequently reported adverse events (>10%) were fatigue and headache; majority were mild or moderate in severity. One patient (<1%) discontinued LDV/SOF due to an adverse event and 11 patients (5%) experienced a serious adverse event. Hemarthrosis, muscle hemorrhage, epistaxis, hematoma, and hematuria were the only hemorrhagic events that occurred in >1 patient. Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities were infrequent with anemia and hyperbilirubinemia the most frequent Grade 3 laboratory abnormality consistent with RBV administration.

Conclusions:

SOF-based regimens led to high rates of SVR in genotype 1–5 HCV infected patients with bleeding disorders. SOF-based regimens were safe and well tolerated with no new toxicity specific to patients with bleeding disorders emerging
.

Swimming is an important life skill that benefits hemophilia patients medically and psychosocially. The goal of this project is to provide inner city children and teenagers the opportunity to learn how to swim. The swim program will be held at the Detroit Medical Center, where a team of professionals will teach the basics of swimming with the goal of independent swimming by the end of the program. The team will measure the children's progress medically and psychosocially throughout the program. This program will provide children and teenagers at our HTC with an amazing opportunity and also a very important life skill. We will also be using adult hemophilia patients to teach the children how to swim, which will provide them with work experience and community involvement.

Dr. Laura Sommerville graduated cum laude from Messiah College and then obtained her MS and PhD degrees in cellular and molecular biology from Temple University. Her graduate work and doctoral dissertation produced several awards and publications in peer reviewed publications. She has been a postdoctoral fellow in the laboratory of Dr. Maureane Hoffman at Duke University since July 2014. Dr. Sommerville's 2015 JGP research fellowship award project is on understanding the loss of perivascular tissue factor during angiogenesis in hemophilia.