Quality of Life/Outcomes Research

Background:

US Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) care reduces mortality and hospitalizations, and guidelines recommend this care model.  Yet national data that uniformly and longitudinally monitors patient experience with HTC care is limited.

Objective:

To assess patient satisfaction with HTC services and clinicians over time.

Methods:

The US HTC Network conducted the first ever nationally uniform patient satisfaction surveys on care received in 2014 and 2017. A Regional workgroup devised, piloted, and finalized an electronic, two-page survey for self-administration at clinic, or at home, in English or Spanish. Content was based on national instruments to enhance comparability and scientific robustness. Questions assessed demographics; satisfaction with HTC team members and services; insurance and language barriers. Respondents were anonymous but identified their HTC.  Participation was voluntary.  Patients with HTC contact in 2014 and 2017 were eligible. Data were collected for 4 months in 2015 and 6 in 2018; on average 130 HTCs (94%) from all US regions participated. Parents completed surveys for children under age 18. Data were entered, analyzed and aggregated at national, regional and HTC levels at a central site.

Results:

5006 and 4767 persons participated, respectively, in 2015 and 2018.  In both years, over 1400 (30%) respondents were female, nearly 80% were White, and 10% Hispanic. On average, 3038 had Factor 8 or 9, 1280 Von Willebrand, 186 other factor deficiencies and 369 other bleeding disorders.  Respondents reported being ‘always’ or ‘usually’ (A/U) satisfied with HTC staff and services from 90% - 97% of the time in both 2014 and 2017. In both years, >4400 gave these highest A/U ratings for HTC Hematologists and Nurses; 3300 for Social Workers; >2600 for Physical Therapists; 1400 for Genetic Counselors, and >1100 for Psychologists.  In both years, 96% were A/U satisfied overall with HTC services. Over 95% gave the A/U satisfaction ratings both years for these services: getting needed care and information, being treated respectfully, spending sufficient time with staff, and involved in shared decision making. 82% and 91% of respondents, respectively, gave the A/U satisfaction ratings for care coordination with primary care providers and other specialists.  Over 90% of >700 youth age 12-17 gave HTC teen transition services the A/U satisfaction ratings both years. 96% of >2760 respondents reported A/U satisfaction with their HTC Pharmacy (340B) Factor Program in 2017. Insurance and language barriers to HTC care posed problems A/U for 27% and 15%, respectively both years.

Conclusions:

Patients consistently report high levels of satisfaction with HTCs, documenting HTC value over time.  Patient satisfaction influences treatment adherence, can influence reimbursement, and is increasingly required by payers. A national uniform survey is feasible to conduct using a regional structure to implement, is well received by patients, and provides critical information to stakeholders.
 

Objective:

The impact of hemophilia on working life, the ability to pursue a desired career or sustain full employment have been previously reported. The aim of this analysis was to seek a better understanding of hemophilia-related health problems likely to impact employment.

Methods:

The analysis utilized data from the Patient Reported Outcomes Burdens and Experience (PROBE) study. Participants selected from among 7 possible responses (working full-time, working part-time, student full-time, student part-time, long-term disability, early retirement and other (e.g., unemployed, parental leave, retired)) to describe their current employment or school status. People with severe hemophilia A and B (PwSH) and controls with no bleeding disorder (NoBD) were compared for the proportion (percentage) reporting either working part-time due to their health or having retired early due to their health, the proportion reporting working full-time. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results as n (%), and odds ratio (95% CI) were calculated for the associations and assessed for their statistical significance.

Summary:

Data from 1009 participants (550 PwSH, 458 NoBD) ≥age 18 from 21 countries was analyzed. Mean age of participants was 39 (14.4 SD) for PwSH and 45.3 (13.7 SD) for NoBD. 250 PwSH (45.5%) and 263 NoBD (57.4%) reported working full time; 86 PwSH (15.6%) and 80 NoBD (17.5%) reported working part-time. 27 of the 86 PwSH (31.4%) and 3 of the 80 NoBD (3.8%) reported working part-time due to health. 52 PwSH (9.5%) and 28 NoBD (6.1%) reported taking early retirement. 25 of the 52 PwSH (48.1%) and 1 of the 28 NoBD (3.6%) reported taking early retirement due to health. Analysis of the association between reporting a health-related problem and reporting to be working part-time or taking early retirement due to health include [odds ratio (95% CI), positive numbers indicating #times higher chance of being part-time/retired early]: use of mobility aids 77.7 (3.8-1645), acute or chronic pain 41.2 (2-831.8), use of pain medication 23 (2.05-258.1), participants with any health problems 22.5 (2-252.6), chronic pain 16.5 (1.5-179.2), difficulties with activities of daily living 16.5 (1.5-179.2), and history of joint surgery 7.3 (0.4-148).

Conclusion:

PwSH are more likely to report working part-time or having taken early retirement due to health-related problems than people with NoBD. Among the study population, we find a significant negative impact of hemophilia on employment status. PwSH is associated with a higher rate of working part-time or retiring early due to health than age-matched controls. Use of mobility aids, acute and chronic pain, difficulties with activities of daily living and history of joint surgery are associated with working part-time or retiring early.

Objectives:

To better understand what symptoms beyond bleeds are experienced, as well as the depth of impact of these symptoms and how they uniquely impact people living with hemophilia on a daily basis. Additionally, the study aims to better understand patients’ satisfaction with current treatments in addressing their hemophilia needs.

Design/Method:

An email invitation was sent to all U.S. members affiliated with hemophilia A of MyHemophiliaTeam, a social network of people diagnosed with or caring for someone with hemophilia. 54 members responded to a 24 question survey between April 19 and May 1, 2017.

Results:

Hemophilia had a significant negative impact on the day-to-day life of adults (72%) and children (52%). Pain was the most broadly and acutely experienced symptom: 60% of adults and 28% of caregivers felt that pain had a major impact on their lives and 33% of adults and 25% of caregivers considered mobility to be significantly impacted by hemophilia.

For adults, both pain and mobility limitations impacted sleep (71% and 45%, respectively), being able to perform chores (71% and 65%), and the ability to work (48% and 45%). For children, these conditions impacted school attendance (61% and 58%) and participation in high impact activities like running or playing soccer (56% and 75%).

Depression and anxiety were also common symptoms that impacted sleep across adults (71%, 61%) and children (60%, 55%). Adults most commonly reported feeling negative ones: stress (38%), fatigue (38%) and annoyance (35%).

81% of adults and 86% of caregivers were extremely or very satisfied with current treatment. However, needs beyond treating bleeds are currently not being met. Few felt their pain was adequately addressed by current therapies (74% of adults and 57% of children reported no relief). Mobility impairment issues were also not being adequately addressed. Time spent on treatment impacted people with hemophilia (39% of adults and 43% of children, respectively were not satisfied with the frequency of treatment).

Background:

While people with hemophilia are known to suffer from bleeding, numerous concomitant symptoms also burden these patients, including pain, mobility impairments, depression, and anxiety. These symptoms can have a significant impact on quality of life, limiting work and school attendance, causing social withdrawal, and encouraging inactivity. Additionally, available treatment options can sometimes fall short in treating the totality of hemophilia symptoms.

Conclusions:

People with hemophilia have many challenges beyond bleeds that are not currently being well addressed. This is particularly true for the pain experienced. As such, a more holistic approach to treating hemophilia beyond bleeds would be beneficial to patients living with hemophilia. Additionally, therapies that reduce the need and frequency for treatment could potentially lower the burden of disease.

Objective:

People with hemophilia frequently experience joint bleeds, resulting in pain and functional impairment. The P-FiQ study formally evaluated patient-reported pain descriptions, responses to standardized patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to pain, and pain management strategies.

Methods:

Participants completed a pain/hemophilia history and 5 PRO instruments. Pain was assessed via 3 PRO instruments: EQ-5D-5L, Brief Pain Inventory v2 Short Form (BPI), and Short Form-36 v2 (SF- 36v2), and these instruments were assessed for reliability, consistency, and correlation with factors including patient-reported characteristics.

Summary:

P-FiQ enrolled 381 adult males with mild-severe hemophilia and a history of pain and/or joint bleeding. Most (65%) self-reported having arthritis/bone/joint problems. Thirty-two percent of participants reported experiencing both acute and chronic pain, 35% chronic pain only, 20% acute pain only, and 15% no pain. Of those reporting acute pain, most described the sensation as “sharp” (77%) or “aching” (65%); for those reporting chronic pain, most described the pain as “aching” (80%) or “nagging” (50%). Ankles (37%) and knees (24%) were commonly reported as the most painful joints. Many participants with acute/chronic pain reported using acetaminophen (62%/55%) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (34%/49%) to treat their pain in the past 6 months. Some participants indicated having moderate/severe/extreme (28%/12%/2%) pain/discomfort “today” as measured by the EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort domain. For BPI (scale 0-10, 10 is most severe pain), median pain severity scores were 6.0 for worst pain, 3.0 for average pain, 2.0 for current pain, and 1.0 for least pain. Median BPI pain interference scores indicated interference with general activity (3.0), mood (3.0), walking ability (3.0), normal work (3.0), and enjoyment of life (2.0). On SF-36, most participants (90%) reported experiencing bodily pain, and 75% indicated that pain interfered with normal work in the last 4 weeks. Assessments of pain on PROs were highly correlated with one another. The following formal PRO assessments were associated with self-reported pain: pain/discomfort domain of EQ-5D-5L, BPI worst pain, least pain, average pain, and current pain, and SF-36 bodily pain. Greater extent of lifetime routine infusions was also associated with EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort and SF-36 bodily pain.

Conclusion:

Pain severity and interference in people with hemophilia were identified consistently across several PROs, and correlated with patient-reported pain. In the comprehensive care setting, greater use of formalized assessment tools over time would improve dialogue and pain assessment between healthcare professionals and patients, document and validate the presence and extent of pain, establish and monitor individual goals for pain management interventions, and encourage the exploration of various pain management strategies and the evaluation of their overall quality and effectiveness.

Objective:

Personalizing treatment to a patient’s lifestyle and promoting overall health and wellness in persons with hemophilia (PWH) is essential to optimizing outcomes. There is limited evidence that correlates how activity and infusions impact bleeding episodes and further data on this relationship is needed. The research objective of SPACE is to prospectively explore the association between activity level, timing of infusion, and occurrence of a bleeding episode in PWH using novel technology.

Methods:

This six-month prospective, observational study includes PWH A or B in the United States currently receiving ADVATE or RIXUBIS between the ages of 13 and 65 years. Enrolled PWH use a smartphone eDiary application to log information on activities, infusions, and bleeding episodes. As an additional measurement of activity, enrollees are given a FitBit, a consumer-based activity tracker that measures steps taken and calories burned. Activity types are assessed based on their level of perceived risk for collision, according to the NHF “Playing It Safe” brochure. We report here current study status and descriptive analysis of baseline data.

Results:

The interim analysis included 15 patients with a median age of 19 (Range: 13 to 47). At baseline, 87% of patients were on prophylaxis and 13% treated on-demand treatment. Fifty-three percent of patients had 0 target joints at baseline. Eighty-seven percent of patients indicated that they had discussed activity participation with their physician. Sixty-seven percent of patients considered themselves ‘very satisfied’ or ‘satisfied’ with their level of activity. Data collected from the FitBit indicated that patients in SPACE walked on average 7,367 (SD: 3250) steps per day and burned 979 (SD: 398) calories from their activity. For patients on prophylaxis, the mean number of days per week doing mild, moderate and strenuous activity were 3.57, 2.64, and 1.5 respectively. Of the data reported on bleeding episodes, 40% of patients reported no bleeds at the time of the interim analysis. Forty percent of patients did not report having a bleed at the time of the interim analysis. Of all bleeds reported, 34% were associated with physical activity.

Conclusions:

Current data from SPACE demonstrates that subjects are active and participating in various activities. Continued data will provide better understanding of the types of activities and infusion schedules that may be associated with risk as well as protective effects on bleeding episodes by infusing prior to activity. A personalized approach to treatment based on physical activity levels may minimize bleeding risk in PWH.

Objective:

To assess pain and functional impairment through 5 patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in non-bleeding adults with hemophilia.

Methods:

Adult men with hemophilia (mild-severe) with history of joint pain/bleeding completed a hemophilia/pain history and 5 PROs (EQ-5D-5L with visual analog scale [VAS], Brief Pain Inventory v2 [BPI-SF], International Physical Activity Questionnaire [IPAQ-SF], SF- 36v2, and Hemophilia Activities List [HAL]) during routine visits. Initial patients were asked to complete the PROs again after their estimated 3-4 hour visit (retest population). PRO scores were calculated from published algorithms. Generally, higher scores indicate better health- related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional status, and greater pain severity/interference.

Summary:

381 Patients were enrolled between October 2013 and October 2014; 164 of the initial 187 completed the retest and are reported here. Median time for completion of the initial survey/PROs was 36.0 minutes and 21.0 minutes for the PRO retest. Most retest subjects had hemophilia A (74.4%) and were white-non-Hispanic (72.6%). Median (Q1, Q3) age was 33.9 (26.9, 46.0), 48.7% were married, 62.6% had some college or graduate education, 80.7% were employed, and 61.0% were overweight or obese. HCV (49.4%) was more common than HIV (16.5%); 61.0% self-reported arthritis/bone/joint problems. Median EQ-5D- 5L VAS was 80.0 (0-100 scale), and EQ-5D-5L health index 0.80 (-0.11-1 scale); 61.6% reported any problems with mobility (29.3% reported moderate/severe problems), 55.8% with usual activities (18.4% moderate/severe), and 22.0% with self-care (4.3% moderate/severe). 73.2% reported pain-discomfort (43.3% moderate/severe), and 41.1% anxiety-depression (14.7% moderate/severe). For BPI, median pain severity was 3.0 (0-10 scale) and pain interference 2.9 (0-10 scale); median worst pain was 6.0, least pain 2.0, average pain 3.0, and current pain 2.0. Pain most impacted general activity, mood, walking ability, and normal work, and least impacted relations with other people. Ankles were the most frequently reported site of pain. Median IPAQ total activity was 693.0 MET/min/week; 49.3% reported no activity in the prior week. Median SF-36v2 scores (0-100 scale) were lower for physical health (39.6) than for mental health (51.6). Median overall HAL score was 76.1 (0-100 scale); complex lower extremity activities were the most impacted activity domain.

Conclusions:

These 5 PRO instruments provide different levels of detail describing the impact of hemophilia on pain and function, and consequently, have varied burdens of administration. PRO data from the retest population demonstrate that most adults with hemophilia experience pain and functional impairment that impacts HRQoL, highlighting the importance of assessments and patient dialogue.

Objective:

Hemophilia is marked by frequent joint bleeding, resulting in acute and chronic pain and functional impairment. Surveys in US adults with hemophilia demonstrate suboptimal pain management and quality of life (QoL). The objective of P-FiQ was to methodologically assess QoL parameters, including functional impairment and pain, and pain management strategies.

Methods:

Adult men with mild-severe hemophilia with a history of joint pain and/or bleeding completed a hemophilia/pain history and various patient-reported outcome assessments (completed twice in “retest” population of initially enrolled patients).

Summary:

Of 164 adults with hemophilia (median age 34) in the “retest” population, more had hemophilia A (74%) than B (26%); 6% had inhibitors. Most had some college-or-above education (63%), 81% were employed, 61% were overweight/obese, and 61% self-reported arthritis/bone/joint problems. Current patient-reported treatment regimens were prophylaxis (42%), on-demand (39%), or mostly on-demand (19%; 25/31 using infusions ahead of activity). One-third (32.9%) reported unrestricted school/work/recreational activities in the prior 6 months; 6.2% reported needing assistance for school/work/self-care, or did not participate in recreational activities because of pain, loss of motion, and weakness. Some patients (31.3%) reported using a cane/crutches/walker (3.8% always) and 7.6% a wheelchair (1.3% always), and 47.0% reported a history of joint surgery (41 knee, 37 ankle, 29 elbow). Patients reported losing an average of 3.7 and 1.8 school/work days in the previous 6 months due to lower and upper extremity problems, respectively. Patients reported that during the prior 6 months they had experienced acute pain only (24%), chronic pain only (33%), or both (29%); 15% reported no pain. Acute pain was most frequently described as sharp (77%), aching (66%), shooting (57%), and throbbing (55%), and chronic pain as aching (74%), nagging (49%), throbbing (44%), and sharp (40%). Most common analgesics in the past 6 months for acute/chronic pain were acetaminophen (69%/58%), NSAIDs (40%/52%), hydrocodone-acetaminophen (29%/33%), oxycodone (12%/11%), and oxycodone- acetaminophen (9%/8%). Most common nonanalgesic treatment strategies reported for acute/chronic pain in the past 6 months were ice (73%/37%), rest (48%/34%), factor or bypassing agent (48%/24%), elevation (34%/28%), relaxation (31%/23%), compression (27%/21%), and heat (25%/15%); other reported strategies include medical marijuana (17%/9%), physical therapy (12%/9%), prayer (11%/8%), faith (9%/8%), alcohol (8%/7%), aquatherapy (5%/6%), illicit drugs (4%/2%), acupuncture (2%/1%), hypnosis (2%/1%), and biofeedback (1%/1%).

Conclusions:

Initial data corroborate the high prevalence of pain and functional disability in adults with hemophilia and highlight opportunities to address clinical assessment, patient dialogue, and management strategies to improve outcomes.

Objective:

Clinical knowledge gaps of hemophilia can affect patient outcomes through delayed diagnosis/referral as well as improper monitoring and interventions. A study was undertaken to identify and characterize clinical practice gaps and confidence levels in the management of hemophilia specific to pediatricians.

Methods:

Building upon a previous assessment developed in 2014, an updated global, hemophilia-specific continuing medical education-accredited clinical practice assessment survey was developed utilizing current evidence-based consensus guidelines and best practices, including guidelines from the National Hemophilia Foundation and the World Federation of Hemophilia. The assessment included both knowledge- and case -based, multiple-choice questions that healthcare providers completed confidentially on-line between March 23, 2015 and April 9, 2015. Areas such as appropriate triggers for initiating prophylaxis and use of physical therapy were assessed. Responses from pediatric providers were de- identified and aggregated prior to analysis.

Summary:

660 pediatricians (30% of total respondents) completed the survey, from the following locales: North America (36%), Asia (23%), Europe (15%), Middle East (10%), Africa (7%), Central/South America (6%), and Australia (4%). Academic (31%), private practice (27%), community hospital (19%), community clinic (12%), and hemophilia treatment center (3%) practice settings were identified. Analysis of pediatricians who indicated professional interaction with hemophilia patients (87% of pediatrician respondents) demonstrated knowledge gaps including (% incorrect responses): classification of severity of hemophilia (37%); optimal use of prophylactic therapy, e.g., when to initiate (31%), at what dose (53%), prophylaxis in active patients (26%); likelihood of inhibitors (75%); using bypassing therapy (58%); comprehensive care model (61%); supporting overall joint health and quality of life (70%); and adherence (60%). A low level of confidence in the ability to identify when to use prophylaxis was reported among 31% of pediatricians. The top barriers to the administration of prophylaxis identified by the pediatric providers included lack of availability of FVIII or FIX concentrates, lack of venous access, and insurance coverage (29%, 22%, and 21% for respondents, respectively).

Conclusions:

This study demonstrated gaps in knowledge and confidence about the assessment and optimal care of hemophilia for pediatricians, suggesting that further education specific to the needs of these providers is warranted.