Bleeding Disorders Conference

Objective:

As a prospective, longitudinal, observational registry of patients with hemophilia (PWH) A and B, the World Bleeding Disorders Registry (WBDR) aims to collect uniform and standardized patient data and guide clinical practice across the world. The WBDR was established in January 2018 by the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH), with a five-year target of 10,000 patients at 200 Hemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) in at least 50 countries.

Methods:

Data collection occurs at the level of participating HTCs and include data on basic demographics, diagnostics, and clinical variables included in the Minimal Data Set, in addition to an Extended Data Set to obtain more complete patient data. All data entered in the WBDR are quality assessed through the WFH Data Quality Accreditation Program. Additionally, an international data integration component was developed to conduct data transfer from existing patient registries to the WBDR.

Summary:

In the first two years, 80 HTCs from 38 countries have received ethics approval. Over 5200 PWH have been enrolled, including 771 patients imported directly from the Czech National Hemophilia Program Registry via data transfer. Patients registered in the WBDR represent all regions of the world and all World Bank Gross National Income (GNI) categories. Trends in global care around the world are beginning to emerge from this early data: the median age at diagnosis for severe patients, an indicator of the level of care in a country, varies considerably based on GNI: ranging from 45 months in low income countries, to 25, 12 and 10 in lower-middle, upper-middle and high income countries respectively. Bleed rates, treatment regimens and factor use also highlight large discrepancies in care globally.

Conclusions:

The significant progress the WBDR has accomplished in its first two years laid a solid foundation on which the registry will continue to expand. This global network of HTCs and patients has started providing real-world data, on which evidence to improve the quality of care worldwide will be generated. The WFH thanks the many dedicated health care providers and patients who are part of this important initiative.

The WBDR is supported by our Visionary Partners: SOBI and Takeda; and our Collaborating Partners: Bayer, CSL Behring, Grifols, Pfizer, and Roche.

Objective:

Multiple factors contribute to bone health, including physical activity, lifestyle, diet, and certain medical conditions. Emicizumab prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in persons with hemophilia A (PwHA). In this study, we explored the potential effect of emicizumab prophylaxis on joint health scores and biomarkers of bone health in PwHA without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors who participated in the HAVEN 3 clinical trial.

Methods:

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) is a tool used to assess joint function and gait, with a lower score indicating better joint health. We obtained HJHS scores from 107 PwHA before starting emicizumab and 48 weeks after starting emicizumab. We also measured biomarkers for bone and joint health in blood samples from 117 PwHA; blood samples were taken before starting emicizumab, and periodically after starting emicizumab (3, 6, 12, and 18 months). In total, 78 people received both the HJHS evaluations and biomarker testing.

Summary:

PwHA who were previously on FVIII prophylaxis and those with no target joints had lower HJHS (indicating better joint health) before starting emicizumab. Average HJHS values decreased 48 weeks after starting emicizumab, indicating improvement in joint function and health. There were 71 people with at least one target joint; among those we saw improvements from baseline in the average total HJHS (-2.25 [95% confidence interval: -4.12, -0.39]) and significant improvements in the joint-specific part of the HJHS, which excluded gait (-2.23 [95% confidence interval:-4.07, -0.38]). Improvement was consistent across HJHS for different joints. Before starting emicizumab, there were no significant differences in biomarkers for bone health between PwHA previously on FVIII prophylaxis or on on-demand treatment, or those with or without target joints. The average values measured for most of the markers were within normal ranges, or were similar to values for healthy individuals documented in the scientific literature; although there was a large variation among individuals tested. None of the measured biomarkers changed significantly during emicizumab prophylaxis. Among the adolescents in this study, levels for three of the biomarkers known to increase during periods of growth were higher than in the adults at each time point.

Conclusions:

This analysis showed clinically relevant improvements in HJHS (defined as a ≥2-point decrease in the joint-specific part of the HJHS) 48 weeks after starting emicizumab prophylaxis in PwHA without FVIII inhibitors. Average values for most of the biomarkers for bone and joint health were similar to values reported in healthy people without hemophilia A, and did not show significant changes during emicizumab prophylaxis. We saw no indication of worsening of the markers for bone and joint health. Additional data are needed to better understand the long-term effect of prophylaxis on bone and joint health.

Objective:

There are limited data on the impact of haemophilia on health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in people affected by non-severe haemophilia. Aim is to evaluate the health status of people living with mild or moderate haemophilia.

Methods:

A cross-sectional, multinational study was conducted as part of the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) project. Respondents without bleeding disorder (NoBD) and those with mild or moderate haemophilia were included. Respondents were asked to complete the PROBE questionnaire, which contains haemophilia-related questions, general health questions and HRQL. Results were compared between unaffected individuals and people with mild or moderate haemophilia.

Summary:

A total of 862 respondents, of whom 144 with moderate haemophilia, 143 with mild haemophilia and 575 with NoBD were included. Median age (first-third quartile) was 33 (23-46),42 (25-55) and 43 (35-54), respectively. In relation to bleeding in the previous 12 months, respondents with mild reported less bleeding frequency than those with moderate haemophilia, with similar patterns of bleeding frequency seen in both male and female cohorts. Reporting of acute pain is less in those with NoBD compared to the mild to moderate cohorts for both genders (male - 33%, 67%, 77%; female - 38%, 52%, 67%, respectively). Thirteen percent of those with NoBD reported an impact on activities of daily living compared with mild and moderate haemophilia who reported of 35% and 61%, respectively. The impact on quality of life due to mild haemophilia compared to those with NoBD was a reduction of 5.2%, 5.0% and 9.3% in VAS, EQ-5D-5L and PROBE Score respectively (p≤0.001).

Conclusions:

People affected by mild or moderate hemophilia encountered a significant amount of haemophilia related sequalae. Future research is needed to identify the optimal management of moderate and mild hemophilia patients, with particular focus on early identification of patients with a severe clinical phenotype.

Background:

In Spring 2017, the Western States/Region IX Hemophilia Treatment Center Network (WSRHN) Coordinating Committee expanded representation to Data Manager/Clinical Research Coordinators (DM/CRC) to address two common challenges.  The DM/CRC chose the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Bleeding Disorder Surveillance Registry as a priority. They conducted a region-wide survey to identify perceived barriers to Registry enrollment and data entry.

Objective:

Implement an effective communications platform for DM/CRC’s to identify and share best practices in data entry quality, and CDC Bleeding Disorder Registry enrollment.

Methods:

In Spring 2018, the DM/CRC Workgroup adopted the Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) video tele-mentoring platform for real-time monthly calls across the region.  During near monthly calls, DM/CRAs engaged counterparts to establish and disseminate best practices for CDC Registry data entry.  Topics, informed by results from the region-wide survey, focused on Clinical Manager, the American Thrombosis Hemostasis Network’s (ATHN) electronic data capture platform for the CDC Registry.  77% of HTC’s in the region joined ECHO calls. Attendance ranged from 5 to 12 participants per call.  In Summer 2019, ATHN joined the calls, invited by the Regional Coordinator, to share this regional best practice.

Summary:

In 2016-2017 our region’s CDC Registry enrollment was 45.7% of target.  Following ECHO implementation, 2017-2018 CDC Registry enrollment grew to 78.1%, then to 103.3% in 2018-2019, the highest ever.  ECHO fostered the establishment of regional data entry best practices for insurance classifications, viral infection, primary diagnoses, and novel therapies. In August 2019, ATHN launched its Data Management Community of Practice (CoP) to facilitate best practices for data collection nation-wide. At the 2019 ATHN Data Summit, a WSRHN/Region IX DM/CRC Workgroup leader presented our experience instituting ECHO for tele-mentoring, and its impact on our CDC Registry enrollment and data quality enhancements. ATHN invited two members from the WSRHN/Region IX DM/CRC Workgroup to help advise and lead its nationwide CoP.

Conclusion:

Representation of DM/CRCs on the regional leadership body, and implementing ECHO calls, raised the profile of DM/CRC’s regionally and nationally.  Regular ECHO calls increased CDC Bleeding Disorder Registry enrollment, standardized data entry accuracy and consistency region-wide, and shows promise for data quality improvements nationally.  

CA: cashburner@c3dibd.org
NC: ncrook@c3dibd.org
RG: rganapathy@c3dibd.org
LP: lisa.preciado@htcnv.org
JB: jbaker@c3dibd.org

Objective:

Understanding characteristics of the aging hemophilia A (HA) population is critical to informing appropriate management strategies. There is paucity of published literature describing the aging HA population. This study aims to examine real-world demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes among treated persons with hemophilia A (PwHA), stratified by age.

Methods:

This retrospective study used data from the Humana Research Database from 01/2007–07/2018. PwHA enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans were identified based on diagnosis codes and treatments for congenital HA. Index was the first evidence for treatment during the identification period. Persons included were required to be enrolled for 12 months after inclusion in the study. Unadjusted comparisons on characteristics, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) were conducted across age groups (<18, 18–55, >55 years).

Summary:

A total of 294 PwHA were identified; the majority were adults (18–55 years=60%, >55 years=17%), males (96%), 59% were seen in a hemophilia treatment center, and 91% had ≥1 FVIII claim. Overall, 30% of patients had evidence of prophylactic treatment. The most common comorbidities were arthritis (40%) and hepatitis C (19%). Severity could be identified in 19%; the majority of which were mild (50.9%). Prophylactic treatment was higher among PwHA aged <18 years (45%) compared with those aged 18–55 years (31%) and >55 years (<20%), while on demand use was more common among those aged 18–55 years (63%) and >55 years (69%) compared with those aged <18 years (49%). Overall, a total of 21% of patients experienced ≥1 bleeding event in the 12-month post-index period, and 41% and 53% had evidence of arthropathy or related disorders, and pain, respectively; all were highest among PwHA aged >55 years. Generally, HCRU increased with age and was highest in PwHA aged >55 years.

Conclusions:

PwHA represent a medically complex group and incur substantial HCRU. Insights on differences in treatment, outcomes, and HCRU as PwHA age may identify opportunities for enhanced disease management particularly for older patients.

Objectives:

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common bleeding disorder in children and adolescents. Its varied clinical presentation contributes to challenges and delays in diagnosis and management. We characterized diagnosis, bleeding, and treatment patterns in children (2-11yrs) and adolescents (12-17yrs) with VWD.

Methods:

This retrospective database analysis utilized data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus Database of medical insurance claims for VWD patients (ICD-9 286.4) from 01/01/2006 to 06/30/2015. Patients included had ≥2 medical claims for VWD and continuous enrollment for ≥2 years, to ensure higher likelihood of definitive VWD diagnosis, before/after their 1st VWD claim. Pre-diagnosis period included 18mos of data before diagnosis. Post-diagnosis period included 7-24mos post-diagnosis data. Data from the first 6-month post-diagnosis period were excluded due to data variability, suggestive of treatment optimization. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographic/clinical characteristics, including types of bleeding episode (BE), rates, outcomes; treating physician specialty; and type of VWD treatment, in both pre-/post-diagnosis periods.

Results:

475/1087 patients identified were children (43% female; mean age at diagnosis 6.9yrs; 612 were adolescents (74% female; mean age at diagnosis 14.9yrs). The top 3 treating physician specialties seen by children in the pre-/postdiagnosis periods, respectively, were hospitalists (21%/9%), primary care physicians (16%/7%), and hematologists (11%/3%). Adolescents were mostly seen by hospitalists (30%/15%), primary care physicians (25%/16%), and obstetrician gynecologists (19%/15%). 11% of children and adolescents saw a hematologist prior to diagnosis, compared with 3% and 5%, respectively, post-diagnosis. A 17%/15% decrease in bleed claims in the pre-/post-diagnosis period was observed among children (40%/23%) and adolescents (59%/44%), respectively. The most common type of BE among children in the pre-/post-diagnosis periods was epistaxis (19%/10%). Heavy menstrual bleeding was the most common BE among adolescents in both the pre-/post-diagnosis periods (40%/30%; in females 54%/40%). Epistaxis was the second most common BE among adolescents in both the pre-/post-diagnosis periods (11%/7%), and in females (9%/5%), but highest among males (17%/12%). Overall, VWD-related treatment claims increased between the pre-/post-diagnosis periods for both children (12%/23%) and adolescents (31%/50%). The most prescribed treatments for bleed management in children were aminocaproic acid (ACA), desmopressin (DDAVP) and nasal cauterization (pre-diagnosis: 5%, 4% and 4%, respectively; post-diagnosis: 11%, 13% and 3%, respectively). For adolescents, the most prescribed treatments, pre- and post-diagnosis respectively, were oral contraceptives (22% and 33%, DDAVP (9% and 19%) and ACA (4% and 11%).

Conclusions:

This analysis demonstrates a decrease in BE claims following VWD diagnosis and a rise in ACA and DDAVP treatment claims in both children and adolescents, and in oral contraceptive claims among female adolescents. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of children and adolescents continue to experience BEs 6mos post-diagnosis. This emphasizes the need for treatment optimization and improvement in care and management of patients in these age groups.

Objectives:

Incidence of hemophilia is commonly cited in the literature as 1/5,032 male births (Soucie et al., Am J Hematol 1998). Estimates of the true population prevalence of hemophilia A (HA; factor VIII deficiency) and B (HB; factor IX deficiency) are limited, and prevalence is influenced by the longer patient life expectancy now versus previous decades. We calculated updated epidemiologic estimates of HA and HB in the USA based on a literature review and other data sources.

Methods:

Data were collected from a systematic literature search (1970–2018) in Medline, EMBASE, conference proceedings, and other secondary data sources including registries (e.g., Registry for Bleeding Disorders Surveillance [part of Community Counts]). Keywords included: hemophilia, bleeding disorder, factor VIII or IX deficiency, incidence, prevalence, mortality, diagnosed, undiagnosed, severity. Eighteen references contributed to the USA analysis. Variables assessed comprised: incidence, prevalence (diagnosed, undiagnosed, total), and disease severity (mild, moderate, severe). Lastly, a simplified Markov model was developed to calculate the annual incoming patients, deaths and prevalence of HA or HB in a given year, including projections to 2020.

Summary:

As most literature references the 1/5,000 male birth incidence rate for HA and HB combined, we used this and assumed it remains constant. Based on assumptions from 2015, and an incidence rate of 15.49 for HA and 4.24 for HB per 100,000 male births there were 321 incident patients with HA and 88 with HB in the USA. Total USA prevalence was estimated to be 22,118 for HA and 6,058 for HB. Diagnosed and undiagnosed prevalence rates per 100,000 males were: 8.69 and 4.87 for HA, and 2.57 and 1.14 for HB, respectively. The corresponding percentage of patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively was 34, 16, and 51% for diagnosed HA and 39, 33, 28% for diagnosed HB. In addition, we assumed severity rates for undiagnosed HA were 70, 30, and 0% and 60, 40, 0% for undiagnosed HB. Given current treatment rates, we assumed prevalence rates plateaued around 2015. Therefore, 2015 prevalence rates were used to project prevalence in 2020. Based on the model, predicted total prevalence of hemophilia A and B in 2020 is estimated to be 22,913 and 6,276 patients. (Table)

Conclusions:

Overall, the model assumes constant incidence rates of HA and HB. Due to exclusion of undiagnosed patients in previous literature, this model’s total prevalence estimates are higher. In the USA, thousands of patients remaining undiagnosed suggest room for improvement in diagnosis and/or reporting.

Objectives:

Clinical profiles of hemophilia B range from mild to severe forms of the disease. Prior studies have investigated the economic burden of hemophilia B, but focused on outcomes within the overall study sample, without stratifying by disease severity or clinical profile. The present study sought to develop an algorithm to identify clinical profiles of hemophilia B for burden of illness assessment, based on indicators that are observable in US payer claims databases.

Methods:

Adult (≥18 year-old) male patients with ≥2 diagnoses of hemophilia B were identified from the Marketscan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (06/2011−02/2019). For each patient, an index date was randomly selected among all hemophilia B diagnosis dates meeting the requirement of continuous enrollment for 1 year pre-index (baseline) and 1 year post-index (study period). Clinical profile was categorized as severe, moderate-severe, moderate, or mild based on frequencies of FIX replacement claims and hemorrhage events at baseline. The selection of profile indicators was informed by literature and clinical expert opinion. To assess the discriminatory ability of the algorithm, healthcare costs were summarized by clinical profile during the study period.

Summary:

A total of 454 patients were included (mean age: 46 years). At baseline, the algorithm classified 66 (15%) as severe [≥6 FIX claims], 69 (15%) as moderate-severe [4-5 FIX claims, or ≤3 FIX claims and ≥1 hemorrhage], 118 (26%) as moderate [1-3 FIX claims and no hemorrhage], and 201 (44%) as mild [no FIX claims or hemorrhage]. During the study period, mean total healthcare costs were higher among patients identified as having more severe profiles (severe: $643,979; moderate-severe: $254,077; moderate: $141,101; mild: $83,291).

Conclusions:

The hemophilia B clinical profile algorithm developed in this study identified four subgroups with increasing healthcare costs according to severity. The development of the first claims-based algorithm to identify clinical profiles creates opportunities to expand potential uses of US payer claims databases for understanding disease burden and unmet medical needs in hemophilia B.

Swimming is an important life skill that benefits hemophilia patients medically and psychosocially. As a recipient of the NHF " Social work Excellence Grant" our HTC has implemented a swim program for patients with hemophilia and other bleeding disorders. We currently have 17 children enrolled and are also monitoring these children by conducting before and after physical therapy and QOL examinations. 

Objective:

Hemophilia may negatively impact a patient’s health utility and quality of life (QoL). Health state utility values (HSUVs) and QoL are important inputs to the evaluation of novel treatment being developed in hemophilia, including gene therapies. This systematic literature review identified and evaluated HSUVs and QoL for people with hemophilia (PWH) type A and/or type B, as well as utility decrements relevant to the experience of PWH, by treatment and health state.

Methods:

Building on a review undertaken in 2014 (Grosse et al. 2015), we conducted a systematic literature review to March 2019 through a search of electronic medical databases, including MEDLINE®, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases and the School of Health and Related Research Health Utilities Database (SCHARRHUD). Major clinical, patient, and pharmacoeconomic conferences in 2016-2019 were also queried. Studies were independently double screened by independent reviewers, after which data extraction was performed.  The information extracted included study design, description of treatment and health state, respondent details, instrument and tariff, HSUV and QoL estimates, quality of study, and appropriateness for use in economic evaluations of novel treatment.

Summary:

Of 1,511 titles and abstracts screened, 20 studies and 12 conference abstracts were included. The studies identified applied a mix of direct and indirect health utility elicitation techniques. Two studies applied direct time trade-off (TTO) methodology and the remaining 30 studies adopted indirect valuation methodologies. HSUVs were found to decrease with increasing disease severity. For example, in Hoxer et al. (2018), mean (standard deviation) HSUV were 0.80 (0.21), 0.73 (0.22) and 0.67 (0.25) in people with mild, moderate, and severe hemophilia, respectively.

Utility values were also found to vary by severity of musculoskeletal damage, frequency of bleed episodes, inhibitors, hemophilia subtype, treatment regimen, treatment adherence and other disease-related complications. Interestingly, HSUVs derived from valuations from the general public were found to be valued lower than those derived from PWH for similar health states. For example, in Carlsson et al. (2017), general population participants consistently rated significantly lower HSUVs for hemophilia disease states compared to PWH (range: 0.54-0.60 vs. 0.67-0.73).

Several hemophilia-specific QoL instruments were used alongside HSUV evaluations. These QoL findings further contribute to improving the understanding of the impact of hemophilia on PWH.

Conclusions:

This systematic review shows significant impact of hemophilia on health utilities and QoL among PWH. The substantial humanistic burden experienced by PWH highlights unmet needs remaining in hemophilia. Our review findings also suggest potential disease state adaptation among PWH, which warrants further research using robust patient preference studies.
 

Introduction:

Photovoice is a qualitative research method that has been used for communities to share pictures as a tool for discussion that is often used at a grassroots advocacy level. Photovoice can show both strengths about a topic or concerns. Photovoice can create empowerment by sharing perspectives and can also create a foundation to advocate for awareness and change.

Long-term Goal:

To create more awareness surrounding bleeding disorders during the month of March, which is bleeding disorders awareness month.

Objectives:

1. To apply Photovoice methodology to the use of social media among the hemophilia population in the Cincinnati, Ohio geographical area.
2. To engage people with hemophilia and their families in sharing their stories related to their bleeding disorder by sharing photographic images on social media during bleeding disorders awareness month.

Methods:

People that follow the Tri-State Bleeding Disorder Foundation on social media as well as members of a closed social media group that consist of parents of children who are patients at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital were asked to participate in the pilot Photovoice project. Participants were asked to share pictures on their own social media pages and to use hashtags to link the photos to the Tri-State Bleeding Disorder Foundation’s page. The project was promoted by sharing an infographic that explained Photovoice and the details of the project. Several community stakeholders were identified as people active on social media and they were personally asked to participate so that examples of the project could be shared with others. There were weekly themes and a weekly contest for pictures that best exemplified that week’s theme with the winners winning a small gift card.

Summary:

This innovative pilot project applied the methodology of Photovoice to social media to generate awareness and advocacy during bleeding disorders awareness month. The theme of this Photovoice project was “Living with Hemophilia”. Weekly themes consisted of: living with a new diagnosis, living with treatment, living and learning about a bleeding disorder, and living with health and being physically active.

Conclusion:

Utilizing Photovoice and applying this methodology to social media as a pilot project with the bleeding disorder population is an innovative idea. This grass roots level movement is a modern way for people to share their story of living with a bleeding disorder. To date, the use of this methodology with the bleeding disorder population has not been documented in the literature. Participants in this project reported satisfaction with being a part of the project. The project’s authors reported that it was a positive and creative way to create more awareness on a personal level about bleeding disorders and they plan to repeat the project in the future. 

Objective:

Daily administrations of FVIII products are considered useful for providing high FVIII coverage for active patients with hemophilia A. This analysis was performed to determine the daily dose levels required of N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol, ESPEROCT^®) vs standard half-life (SHL) FVIII (N8, turoctocog alfa, Novoeight^®) to normalize risk of activity-related bleeding for patients with hemophilia participating in daily sports activities (practices, games) of varying risk profiles.

Methods:

Patients with hemophilia engaging in physical activity have associated increased bleeding risk with sports that have increased potential for contact injuries as classified by Broderick et al (JAMA. 2012): Class 1 - no contact (eg, swimming); Class 2 - contact might occur (eg, basketball); and Class 3 - inevitable contact (eg, American football). To normalize the risk of bleeding, nominal targets of FVIII activity levels for at least 2 h/d based on Broderick et al were chosen: above 30% (Class 1), above 50% (Class 2), and above 70% (Class 3).

Pharmacokinetic (PK) simulations were performed using a one-compartment model with first-order elimination. FVIII PK profiles were simulated for the extended half-life (EHL) N8-GP based on the pathfinder 1 PK trial showing 60% prolonged half-life compared with prior SHL FVIII. For PK simulations of an SHL, N8 was used due to 104⁰F stability with PK based on the guardian clinical trial program.

Summary:

Daily doses to sustain at least 2 h/d of 30%/50%/70% activity were estimated for N8-GP (9, 15, and 21 IU/kg) and N8 (14, 23, and 33 IU/kg). Steady-state PK profile simulations of once-daily administration are shown in the Figure.
 

Conclusion:

Experience with routine prophylaxis with EHL/SHL FVIIIs towards guideline recommended >1% activity does not readily translate to HCP understanding of the PK with high daily or much higher every-other-day administration required to minimize risk for the active patient. With a 1.6x (60%) prolongation in half-life for adolescents/adults, this model shows daily N8-GP to be a more efficient strategy compared with daily SHL FVIII (N8) to cover the active patient; N8-GP achieves higher trough levels with a smaller increase in overall factor consumption compared with standard prophylaxis with SHL FVIII. 

Objective:

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, however, initial diagnosis and subsequent management of patients after diagnosis remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to characterize the specialists who are treating patients before and after diagnosis of VWD. We also identified the most common bleeding types and the treatments given to these patients.

Methods:

This retrospective study analysed data from a US medical claims insurance database (IQVIA PharMetrics Plus Database) for patients who had made insurance claims for VWD (International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition [ICD-9] code: 286.4). The claims were made from January 01, 2006 to June 30, 2015. Patients with ≥2 medical claims for VWD and who were continuously enrolled for a 2-year period before and after their 1 st VWD claim were included in this study. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographic and clinical characteristics, which included bleed types, treating physician specialty, and type of VWD treatment, in both the pre- and post-diagnosis periods.

Summary:

A total of 3,756 patients were included: 73% were female, and the median age at VWD diagnosis was 34 years old (age range 2–82 years). Pre-diagnosis, the top 3 treating physician specialties were hospitalists (22%), primary care physicians (14%) and obstetrician-gynecologists (13%). Post-diagnosis, the top 3 treating physician specialties were hospitalists (14%), primary care physicians (8%) and obstetrician- gynecologists (10%). Only 6% of patients saw a specialist hematologist before VWD diagnosis for a bleeding event and this decreased to 3% after diagnosis. The number of claims made by patients for bleeding events decreased from 45% pre-diagnosis to 34% post-diagnosis. In females, heavy menses were the most common bleed type, representing 29% of pre-diagnosis claims and 21% of post-diagnosis claims. In males, epistaxis was the most common bleed type, representing 13% of pre-diagnosis claims and 8% of all post-diagnosis claims. Overall, insurance claims for medical treatments associated with VWD increased from 19% pre-diagnosis to 27% post-diagnosis. The most prescribed treatments in women were oral contraceptives, desmopressin (DDAVP) and aminocaproic acid (ACA) (pre-diagnosis: 18%, 5% and 2%, respectively; post- diagnosis: 20%, 11% and 5%, respectively). In men, the most prescribed treatments were DDAVP, ACA and von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates (pre-diagnosis: 5%, 4% and 2%, respectively; post-diagnosis: 9%, 6% and 4%, respectively).

Conclusions:

These data show an overall reduction in the frequency of bleeding event insurance claims after VWD diagnosis. This was coupled with an increase in treatment insurance claims for DDAVP, ACA and VWF after diagnosis. These results highlight the importance of diagnosis of VWD and treatment optimization in these patients. Also, only a minority of patients received care from a hematologist, which may impact treatment and care.

Factor XIII deficiency is classified under rare bleeding disorders and is in fact, the rarest with an incidence of 1 in 2 to 3 million births and is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. On the other hand, Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is the most common bleeding disorder occurring in about 1% of the US population. Type 2M Von Willebrand Disease (Type 2M VWD), a subtype of Type 2 VWD, has an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and is characterized by decreased activity of Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) and its failure to interact with platelets. This report describes an interesting case of an individual with a combined severe congenital factor XIII deficiency and a recently diagnosed Type 2M VWD.

A 43 year old male diagnosed with severe congenital factor XIII deficiency at birth following umbilical stump bleeding has been on regular prophylaxis since 2007. Frequent breakthrough bleeds despite receiving prophylactic infusions of Factor XIII concentrate prompted a re-evaluation of the patient’s coagulation profile. Clinical laboratory parameters consistent with a diagnosis of Type 2M VWD were observed in addition to his underlying severe Factor XIII deficiency. DNA sequencing identified a novel missense variant p.Arg1136Trp (c.3406C>T) as the possible causative mutation.

Weekly blood draws overlapping 3 cycles of prophylactic infusions of Tretten (recombinant FXIII-A subunit concentrate) revealed peak and trough factor XIII activity levels of ~80% and ~10% respectively. The subject had a largely sedentary life style over this period of 12 weeks indicating, based on previous experience, that any moderate to vigorous physical activity could necessitate maintenance of a higher trough level. Additionally, the potential utility of VWF concentrates to effectively manage the second hemostatic defect and prevent breakthrough bleeds needs to be explored.

To our knowledge, this is the first report describing a unique combination of severe congenital factor XIII deficiency and type 2M VWD.

Objective:

Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) and recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) are two modified rFIX compounds with extended half-lives compared with standard FIX products. We report results from two head-to-head, single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) trials comparing N9-GP with standard FIX and rFIXFc in previously-treated patients (PTPs) with congenital hemophilia B (≤2% FIX).

Methods:

paradigm™1 (NCT00956345) was a first human-dose trial in PTPs investigating the safety and PK of a single N9-GP dose. Sixteen PTPs (21-55 years) received one dose of their previous FIX product, followed by one dose of N9-GP at the same dose level (25, 50, or 100 IU/kg) with ≥7 days between doses. FIX activity was assessed up to 48 hours (standard FIX) or 168 hours (N9-GP) with additional samples at 2 and 4 weeks analyzed by one-stage clotting assay (TriniCLOT™) with product-specific standard as calibrator. paradigm™7 (NCT00956345) was a multicenter, randomized, head-to-head trial where 15 patients (21-65 years) received single injections (50 IU/kg) of N9-GP and rFIXFc with ≥21 days between doses. FIX activity was assessed for up to 240 hours using a one-stage clotting assay (SynthAFax or Actin FSL) and a chromogenic assay (ROX factor IX) with normal human plasma as calibrator. The primary endpoint was area under the FIX activity–time curve from 0 to infinity, dose normalized to 50 IU/kg (AUC0-inf,norm).

Summary:

In paradigm™1, the estimated terminal half-life of N9-GP was 93 hours, 4.8 times longer than for patients’ previous product. For N9-GP, estimated incremental recovery at 30 minutes (IR30min) (1.33 IU/dL per IU/kg) was 94% and 20% higher compared with rFIX and plasma-derived FIX (pdFIX), respectively. AUC0-inf,norm with N9-GP was 10.1 times and 7.7 times higher compared with rFIX and pdFIX, respectively. Time to 3% and 1% FIX activities was 16.2 and 22.5 days, respectively. In paradigm™7, the estimated AUC0-inf,norm measured with one-stage clotting assay was 4.4 times higher for N9-GP compared with rFIXFc (9656 versus 2199 IU*h/dL). IR30min was 2.2 times higher (1.7 versus 0.8 IU/dL per IU/kg), maximum activity, dose normalized to 50 IU/kg, was 2 times higher (91% versus 45%), and FIX activity at 168 hours was 5.8 times higher (19% versus 3%). N9-GP had a longer terminal half-life (103.2 versus 84.9 hours; ratio: 1.22). Results were similar when measuring FIX activity with chromogenic assay. One patient in paradigm™1 developed transient hypersensitivity symptoms during administration of N9-GP and was excluded from PK analyses. No patient developed inhibitors in either trial, and no unexpected safety concerns were identified.

Conclusion:

These two single-dose PK trials show that N9-GP achieves higher FIX activity levels and greater AUC than pdFIX, rFIX, and rFIXFc through higher recovery and longer terminal half-life. These findings will support clinicians’ understanding of differences in PK between specific FIX products.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to explore the bivariate and linear relationships between and among self-compassion, hope, and quality of life (QOL) among individuals with bleeding disorders. It is expected that these findings will guide the development of positive psychological interventions for this population.

Methods:

The final sample included 86 participants (61.6% male) with a mean age of 29.7 years (SD = 14.42). The majority of participants were diagnosed with hemophilia A (44.2%) or von Willebrand disease (44.2%). Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, and 3 self-report measures: the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Neff, 2003), the Adult Hope Scale (AHS; Snyder et al., 1991), and the PedsQL Inventory – Core Generic (Varni et al., 1999). The SCS is a 26-item scale with 6 subscales. Three subscales assess positive components (self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness) and three subscales assess negative components (self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification). The AHS is a 12 item instrument comprised of two scales: agency (the ability to identify goals for the future) and pathways (the ability to identify means to achieve those identified goals). The PedsQL assesses physical, mental, social, and school/work domains of QOL, in addition to total QOL, assessing all subscales.

Summary:

There was a significant and positive relationship between overall Quality of Life (QOL) and Overall Self-Compassion (r = .39, p < .001). There were significant and inverse bivariate relationships between Overall Quality of Life and each of the negative Self-Compassion components including Self-Judgement (r = -.44, p < .001), Isolation (r = -.35, p < .001), and Over-Identification (r = -.45, p < .001). A multiple regression analysis was conducted to explore the linear relationship of self-compassion and hope with QOL. Self-Compassion and hope were found to be significant concurrent predictors of QOL, F (2, 83) = 11.45, p < .001. Examination of the standardized beta weights revealed that hope (β = .31, t = 2.54, p < .05) was the only significant individual contributor to QOL.

Conclusions:

Hope and self-compassion were identified as variables that contribute to QOL among individuals with bleeding disorders. Hope, defined as the ability to identify and work toward identified goals, was the strongest predictor of QOL in the model. These findings provide implications for the use of hope-increasing interventions as a means to improve QOL. These findings provide further evidence for the use of strengths-based strategies to enhance well-being within the bleeding disorder population. Future studies could evaluate the effectiveness of specific interventions to improve hope and QOL among various subsets of the bleeding disorder community.

Background:

Inherited factor X deficiency is an autosomal recessive bleeding disorder with an estimated occurrence rate of 1:1,000,000¹. Historically, bleeding symptoms have been treated with topical therapies, antifibrinolytic agents, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or plasma-derived FIX concentrates (PCCs). In 2015, the first factor X (FX) concentrate was approved in the U.S.

Objective:

This organization was interested in reviewing clinical outcomes such as perceived pain and unplanned hospitalizations of adults and children with FX disease currently being treated in the home with Coagadex®. METHODS: This organization conducted a retrospective review of a population of seven adult and pediatric patients. Patients were surveyed for pain, bleeding episodes, hospitalizations/ ER visits, dosing parameters and administration methods pre/post initiation of FX therapy. There were 3 children, 12 years old and under and four adults. Ages ranged from 5-60 years old with the average age of 27.9. There were five males and two females. The average length of treatment was 6.4 months. One patient was naïve, six converted from other therapies. Dose ranges administered by caregivers or self-infusion were 750 -2800 IU (26-61 IU/Kg). One patient was on-demand and six were administering prophylaxis therapy.

Results:

There were two converted prophylaxis patients reported pain with PCC’s and none with FX; one on-demand naïve patient stated his pain was markedly improved with prn administration of FX; four converted prophylaxis patients with no prior pain history reported no changes in pain on FX therapy. For on-demand patients treating bleeding episodes, three reported a decrease in the number of bleeding episodes, three were unchanged and one reported one additional bleeding episode. A total of ten hospitalizations or emergency room visits were reported during the six months prior to initiation of FX treatment and only one in the six months following initiation of treatment.

Conclusion:

Early recognition and home treatment with FX concentrate allows for prompt resolution of bleeding symptoms, decreased pain and decreased hospitalization or emergency room visits. Further investigation is needed to determine cost-savings for decreased hospitalization/ ER visits.References:Brown, D.L. & Kouides, P.A. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of Inherited Factor X deficiency. Haemophilia. (14). 1176-1182. Retrieved from: https://www.hemophilia.org/sites/default/files/document/files/DiagnosisAndTreatmentOfInheritedFact…

Objective:

BAY 94-9027 is an extended–half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product. In the PROTECT VIII Kids trial, BAY 94-9027 was efficacious for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated children with severe hemophilia A. We report interim long-term efficacy and safety data from the PROTECT VIII Kids extension study.

Methods:

In PROTECT VIII Kids, previously treated patients (PTPs) aged <12 years with severe hemophilia A received BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis twice weekly (25‒60 IU/kg), every 5 days (45‒60 IU/kg), or every 7 days (60 IU/kg). Patients completing ≥50 exposure days (EDs) and ≥6 months in the main study or a 12-week safety substudy (part 2) that enrolled PTPs aged <6 years could continue in the optional extension for an additional ≥50 EDs.

Summary:

Fifty-nine of 73 patients treated with BAY 94-9027 in PROTECT VIII Kids (main study or part 2) continued in the extension (median [range] age at enrollment in the main study, 5.0 [2–11] years). At data cutoff (January 2018), patients had a median (range) of 1456 (351–1665) days in the trial (main study or part 2 plus extension). Patients in the extension received prophylaxis twice weekly (n=20), every 5 days (n=20), every 7 days (n=8), or switched prophylaxis frequency during the extension (variable frequency; n=11). Median (range) dose/infusion was 52.1 (19–62) IU/kg. Median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for total bleeds was 1.8 for all patients and 0.8, 1.1, 2.1, and 3.2 for those treated twice weekly, every 5 days, every 7 days, or with varying frequency, respectively. Median ABR for joint bleeds in all patients was 0.7. During the extension, 3 patients (5.1%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) classified as mild (n=1), moderate (n=1), or severe (n=1). One patient discontinued because of a serious AE that was not related to treatment. No confirmed FVIII inhibitors or anti-PEG antibodies were observed; no patients had sustained levels of detectable PEG in plasma.

Conclusions:

Long-term treatment (up to ~4.5 years) with BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis was efficacious and well tolerated in previously treated pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A.

Objective:

BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry®) is a full-length, unmodified recombinant human factor VIII (FVIII) for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in patients with hemophilia A. Safety and efficacy of BAY 81-8973 in children, adolescents, and adults were established in the LEOPOLD clinical trials. This analysis reports interim data from the LEOPOLD Kids extension study for patients with ≥100 exposure days (EDs) to BAY 81-8973 in the main study plus extension study.

Methods:

In LEOPOLD Kids, boys aged ≤12 years with severe hemophilia A and ≥50 EDs to FVIII received BAY 81-8973 (25–50 IU/kg) ≥2 times/wk for ≥50 EDs. Patients completing the main study could enroll in an ongoing extension study for ≥100 EDs.

Summary:

Of 51 patients who completed the main study, 46 (90.2%) entered the extension study (aged <6 years, n=22; aged 6–12 years, n=24). Patients were treated for a median (range) of 1494 (175–1989) days and accumulated 546 (67–1011) EDs in the extension study. Median (quartile [Q]1; Q3) dose per prophylaxis infusion was 37.7 (33.1; 41.8) and 30.9 (29.1; 34.9) IU/kg for younger and older patients, respectively; annual prophylaxis dose was 4984 (3679; 6529) and 4089 (3283; 5555) IU/kg. Median (Q1; Q3) annualized number of total bleeds was 2.0 (0.2; 4.2) and 1.8 (0.5; 3.0) for younger and older patients, respectively; annualized total bleed rate was 3.0 (0; 6.0) and 0 (0; 6.4) for these patients in the main study. Median (Q1; Q3) annualized total bleeds within 48 hours of prophylaxis infusion was 0.8 (0; 1.7) and 1.0 (0.1; 1.6) in younger and older patients in the extension study. Response was excellent/good in 337/405 bleeds (83.2%); data were missing for 22 (5.4%) bleeds. Most bleeds (93.5%) were mild/moderate and were spontaneous (42.4%) or trauma related (53.6%). One patient experienced a mild treatment-related serious adverse event (transient very low FVIII inhibitor titer concurrent with acute infection and positive immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin) and remained in the extension study. No change in treatment was required, and the patient was clinically well.

Conclusions:

Data from the LEOPOLD Kids extension study show that BAY 81-8973 provides safe and effective long-term prophylaxis in children with severe hemophilia A treated for a median of 4.1 years, confirming safety results observed in the main study.

Objective:

BAY 94-9027 is an extended–half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product. Efficacy in maintaining hemostasis during major surgery was evaluated in a subset of patients with severe hemophilia A in the phase 2/3 PROTECT VIII study.

Methods:

Patients aged 12–65 years requiring major surgery during PROTECT VIII or its ongoing extension were included in the analysis. Patients with severe hemophilia A undergoing major surgery who were not enrolled in PROTECT VIII but met all study inclusion and exclusion criteria also were eligible to participate. BAY 94-9027 dosing during the perioperative period was based on preoperative pharmacokinetic measurements and adjusted at the physician’s discretion. Types of procedures and duration of surgeries, BAY 94-9027 consumption on the day of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, surgeon assessment of hemostasis during surgery, and need for blood transfusion were evaluated.

Summary:

17 patients (median [range] age, 37 [13–61] years) underwent 20 major surgeries, including 15 orthopedic surgeries (9 joint replacements [hip, n=1; knee, n=6; ankle, n=2], 2 open synovectomies, 3 arthroscopies, and 1 thigh hematoma evacuation), 3 complex dental extractions, 1 penile prosthesis, and 1 inguinal hernia repair at data cutoff (January 2015). Median (range) surgical duration was 102 (17‒217) minutes, and median (range) total dose used on day of surgery, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative infusions on that day, was 72.4 (43‒136) IU/kg. Median (range) number of FVIII infusions on the day of surgery was 2 (1–3), with 40% of procedures requiring only 1 infusion (preoperative) on that day. Following a median (range) presurgical dose of 52.1 (41–64) IU/kg, the median (range) FVIII level (chromogenic assay; measured in a central laboratory) immediately before the second infusion was 71.6 (44–140) IU/dL; median (range) time between the presurgical and second infusions was 12.3 (3.6–50.0) hours. Hemostasis during surgery was good (13/20; 65%) or excellent (7/20; 35%) for all procedures. Intraoperative blood loss was within expected ranges for all surgeries (median [range], 50 [0–1000] mL), and blood transfusions were required in 4 patients undergoing knee surgeries.

Conclusions:

BAY 94-9027 is efficacious in maintaining hemostasis during major surgeries in adolescents and adults with severe hemophilia A. Excellent or good hemostasis with blood loss as expected was achieved in all surgical procedures, which included major orthopedic surgeries (75% of all procedures), with 40% of patients requiring only a single infusion of BAY 94-9027 on the day of surgery.

Objective:

As a single gene disorder of Factor VIII (FVIII), hemophilia A (HA) is an ideal candidate for gene therapy. We present results from an ongoing Phase 1/2 study of valoctocogene roxaparvovec (BMN 270; AAV5-FVIII-SQ) gene transfer in patients with severe HA.

Methods:

As of 16 April 2018, 13 subjects (6E13 vg/kg, n=7; 4E13 vg/kg, n=6) received a single intravenous dose of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, an AAV5 vector containing a B-domain-deleted FVIII gene. Safety, efficacy, immunogenicity, and other endpoints are being evaluated.

Summary:

FVIII activity is presented as median levels over 4-week intervals. In the 6E13 cohort, FVIII activity plateaued by Week 20 post-valoctocogene roxaparvovec, with median levels between Weeks 20-104 in the non-hemophilic range ([range] 46-122 IU/dL); Week 104 median FVIII activity was 46 IU/dL ([range] 6-145 IU/dL). In the 4E13 cohort, median [range] FVIII activity increased to just below the normal range (NR) at Week 52 [n=6]: 32 [3-59] IU/dL. Prior FVIII prophylaxis subjects had median [interquartile range, IQR] annualized FVIII infusions decline from 139 [122-157] (6E13) and 156 [126-183] (4E13) to 0 [0-0.4] and 0 [0-1] 4 weeks post-infusion through last follow-up; median [IQR] annualized bleeding rates post-infusion were 0 [0-0] in both cohorts (no bleeding episodes in 5 subjects in each cohort). Mild, grade 1, asymptomatic alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increases were reported in six of seven 6E13 and four of six 4E13 subjects; one 4E13 subject had a grade 2 ALT increase. Peak ALT levels ranged from 44-141 U/L (upper limit of normal=43 U/L). All subjects had a normal ALT level at last follow-up and all subjects were off of corticosteroid therapy. No subjects developed inhibitors to FVIII.

Conclusions:

Gene transfer with valoctocogene roxaparvovec in subjects with severe HA resulted in sustained, clinically relevant FVIII activity that reduced self-reported bleeding and exogenous FVIII use 2 years post-infusion in the 6E13 cohort. FVIII activity in the 4E13 cohort was maintained at the upper range of mild HA 1 year post-infusion. Both doses enabled achievement of long-term therapeutic levels of FVIII activity and prevention of hemophilia-related bleeding with a favorable safety profile.

Objective:

Patient satisfaction with healthcare services is a measure of patient centeredness, influences treatment adherence, and increasingly affects reimbursement. In 2018, the US Hemophilia Treatment Center Network (USHTCN) launched the second national Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS).

Methods:

A Steering Committee and Regional HTC Coordinator work group updated, piloted, and finalized the two-page survey for patient self-administration online, at clinic, or at home, in English or Spanish, and mailed to households. Survey content and format were based on national health surveys to enhance comparability and scientific robustness. Questions included assessed patient demographics, satisfaction with team members, and care processes aligned with HRSA goals. An open ended question sought qualitative data. Respondents were anonymous but the HTC where they received care was identified. Participation was voluntary. Persons with genetic bleeding disorders who had HTC contact in 2017 were eligible. Since March 2018, HTCs sent surveys to approximately 31,650 households. Parents were asked to complete surveys for children under age 15. No reminders were sent. Data were entered and analyzed at a central site and aggregated at national, regional and HTC levels. Survey remains open through summer 2018.

Results:

4042 individuals (12.8%) from 125 (90%) of the 139 Centers in the USHTCN returned surveys by June 12, 2018. National analyses on 4042 surveys reveal that 93% - 98% were ‘always’ or ‘usually’ satisfied with HTC care processes: shared decision making (97%); care coordination (97%); obtaining understandable information (97%); getting timely services (95%); enough time with staff (97%); being treated respectfully (98%); and HTC Factor Program/Pharmacy (340b) (96%). 95% - 97% were ‘always’ or ‘usually’ satisfied with core HTC team members. 91% of 12-17 year olds were ‘always’ or ‘usually’ satisfied with HTC encouragement regarding becoming more independent, and 92% with how the HTC discussed caring for a bleeding disorder upon reaching adulthood. Insurance and language were ‘always’ or ‘usually’ a problem for 14% and 9% respectively. 31% of respondents were female and 10% Hispanic. 80% were Caucasian, 5% African-American, 4% Asian/Pacific Islander or Native Hawaiian, 4% Multiple races, and 7% did not respond. Over 60% had severe or moderate FVIII or FIX deficiency or VWD Type 3. Ages ranged from newborns to over 90 years: 37% under 18, 18% age 18 – 34, and 45% over age 35.

Conclusions:

Implementing a National Patient Satisfaction Survey for the USHTCN remains feasible, is supported by HTCs nationally, and provides valuable information. Satisfaction with HTC services including 340B pharmacy is high. Insurance and language pose problems for 9-14%. Future analyses will examine additional national data and regional variation, and identify trends from the first national PSS conducted in 2014.

Advancements in medical care for the hemophilia patients has created the need for an active and intentional process of transition from pediatric oriented health care to adult oriented health care. Instruments to measure transition “readiness” have not been validated in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) hemophilia population. The primary aim of this study was to identify the baseline state of transition readiness of hemophilia males in their ability to take charge of their own care as they transition from pediatrics to adult care using a validated Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ). Our secondary objective was: 1) To compare transition readiness between young adults who are transitioned to an adult hemophilia clinic in a separate facility versus those who continue to receive care in the same facility but transitioned to an adult provider.

Methods:

For this purpose, we conducted a cross-sectional study at the Hemophilia study of Western New York (HCWNY), Buffalo (same facility) and at Children’s Hospital of Michigan (CHM), Detroit (separate facility). Inclusion criteria: 1) males who are currently 16-21 years old, 2) diagnosis of hemophilia A and B regardless of severity, 3) ability to read English at a grade 8 level. TRAQ is a 20-item, 5- domain patient-reported assessment of health and health care self-management skills with possible scores ranging from 1 (low) to 5 (optimal). Parents/legal guardians of patients aged 16 to 17 and patients aged 18-21 were mailed a letter explaining the study in detail. The willing participants were directed to the questionnaire link. The responses were anonymous which were directly imported into excel spread sheet without collecting any identifying information of the participants.

Results:

A total of 13 individuals at the two sites participated. Amongst these, there were 5 from the HCWNY site, 1 with mild hemophilia and 1 patient reported unknown severity. The mean overall TRAQ score was 4+0.8. The mean scores for the different subscales were: managing medications (4.2+0.8), appointment keeping (4.1+0.9), tracking health issues (3.6+1.2), talking with providers (4.4+1.2) and managing daily activities (4.1+1.1). No differences in the overall and the subscales scores was noted between the two centers (Wilcoxon rank sum for all p>0.05).

Conclusions:

Our results suggest that the hemophilia youth in our population appear to have good readiness to transition from pediatric to adult care. We did not find a difference between the two different clinical care settings. The tracking health issues portion of TRAQ demonstrated the least readiness. Our study demonstrates that transition readiness assessments can be implemented in the hemophilia treatment centers, which can be used to guide clinical care.

Objectives:

Emicizumab, a novel bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody promotes coagulation by bridging FIXa and FX to replace the function of missing activated FVIII, and has potential to address unmet medical needs in pediatric persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) with inhibitors. This study assessed efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of once-weekly subcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis in pediatric PwHA with inhibitors.

Methods:

The study (NCT02795767) enrolled PwHA with inhibitors aged <12 years (or 12–17 years if <40 kg) previously treated with bypassing agents to receive emicizumab prophylaxis for ≥52 weeks. Emicizumab was administered subcutaneously at 3 mg/kg/week for 4 weeks, followed by 1.5 mg/kg/week thereafter. Efficacy objectives included bleed rate, and comparison of the bleed rate on emicizumab prophylaxis vs historical bleed rate obtained from a prospective, non-interventional study (NIS; NCT02476942). The NIS collected detailed, high-quality real- world data on bleeds and safety outcomes from a cohort of pediatric PwHA with inhibitors treated according to local, routine clinical practice. Participants from the NIS could subsequently enter the HAVEN 2 study, which permitted intra-individual comparisons.

Summary:

This interim analysis included 20 PwHA with inhibitors aged 3–12 years (median 8.5); 19 aged <12 years were included in the efficacy analyses. The median observation time was 12.1 weeks (range 7–14). In total, 18/19 (94.7%) participants had zero treated bleeds and 12/19 (63.2%) did not bleed while on study. Overall, 14 bleeds were reported in 7 participants, with none occurring in a joint or muscle. No participants have required up- titration of emicizumab. A substantial reduction in ABR on study vs ABR on prior treatment with bypassing agents (non-interventional study) was observed in 8 participants included in the intra-individual comparison; all 8 participants reported zero bleeds with emicizumab prophylaxis (efficacy period 85–99 days). Emicizumab was well tolerated; most common AEs were mild injection-site reactions (15%) and nasopharyngitis (15%). Three unrelated serious AEs were observed (mouth hemorrhage, appendicitis, catheter site infection). No thromboembolic or thrombotic microangiopathy events were reported. No anti-drug antibodies were detected. Mean trough emicizumab concentrations of >50 μg/mL were achieved after 4 loading doses of 3 mg/kg/week and sustained with maintenance doses of 1.5 mg/kg/week, and were consistent across age groups and body weight.

Conclusion:

Emicizumab prophylaxis was well tolerated and prevented/reduced bleeds in pediatric PwHA with inhibitors. Clinically meaningful reductions in ABR were observed compared with ABR on prior treatment with bypassing agents. The pharmacokinetic profile of emicizumab was similar to that seen in adolescent/adult PwHA with inhibitors. These interim data show the potential for emicizumab to reduce the disease and treatment burden for pediatric PwHA with inhibitors.

Objectives:

Emicizumab, a bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody in development to address unmet medical needs in persons with hemophilia A with inhibitors (PwHAwI), bridges FIXa and FX to replace the function of missing FVIIIa, needed for effective hemostasis. This study assessed efficacy, safety and PK of emicizumab prophylaxis in PwHAwI.

Methods:

Study NCT02622321 was conducted at 43 centers/sites, and enrolled PwHAwI ≥12 y.o. Participants (pts) receiving prior episodic bypassing agents (BPAs) were randomized (2:1) to emicizumab prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis (Arm A vs B). Primary endpoint compared treated bleed rates in Arm A vs B. PwHAwI receiving prior prophylactic BPA received emicizumab prophylaxis in Arm C. Emicizumab was injected subcutaneously at 3 mg/kg/wk for 4 wks, and 1.5 mg/kg/wk thereafter.

Summary:

109 male PwHAwI were enrolled; median age 28 (range 12–75) yrs. Median (range) emicizumab treatment exposure was 24.0 (3.0–47.9) wk overall and 29.5 (3.3–47.9) wk in Arm A. Statistically significant, clinically meaningful reductions (87%) in treated bleed rates were observed between emicizumab prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis (Arm A vs B) (annualized bleeding rate [95% confidence interval] 2.9 [1.69 to 5.02] versus 23.3 [12.33 to 43.89], P<0.0001), and in all secondary bleed-related endpoints (spontaneous, joint, target joint, and all bleeds). Of note, a 79% reduction in treated bleed rate was seen with emicizumab prophylaxis (Arm C) vs BPA prophylaxis prior to study entry in a non-interventional study (NCT02476942; intra-individual comparison, P=0.0003). Overall, 67.3% of PwHAwI on emicizumab prophylaxis had zero treated bleeds. Statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health status were seen for Arm A vs B. Emicizumab was well tolerated. Total of 198 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 103 pts; most common AEs were injection-site reactions (15%), and 12 serious AEs were reported in 9 (8.7%) pts. Thrombotic microangiopathy and thrombosis (2 pts each in primary analysis) were reported and associated with high cumulative aPCC doses averaging >100 U/kg daily for >24 hr prior to event onset. No events occurred with emicizumab prophylaxis alone. Both TMA events resolved once aPCC treatment was stopped, and the thrombotic events did not require anticoagulation; 2 pts resumed emicizumab without sequelae (1 with TMA, 1 with thrombosis). No antidrug antibodies were detected. Mean trough emicizumab concentrations >50 μg/mL were achieved after 4 loading doses (3 mg/kg/wk) and sustained with maintenance doses of 1.5 mg/kg/wk.

Conclusion:

Emicizumab prophylaxis prevented or substantially reduced bleeds in PwHAwI and meaningfully improved HRQoL. Emicizumab had acceptable safety without excess thrombotic risk in the absence of concomitant aPCC. PK levels were sustained with once- weekly maintenance doses. These promising data could support a paradigm shift in the management and lives of PwHAwI.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to determine if the young boys with hemophilia at our clinic have gross motor delays that may have been missed during the annual physical therapy evaluation. By identifying delays, our clinic can improve the standard of care and promote gross motor development in our patients to enhance their ability to be physically active and protect their joints and muscles from injury.

Method:

Over a one year period, boys with hemophilia A or B between the ages of 4 to 14 were tested by the physical therapist at our clinic using the Bruinink’s-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Addition, BOT2. The BOT2 is a valid and reliable gross motor test for 4 to 21 year olds and is widely used to detect mild to moderate motor delays. The five gross motor subtests used in this study included upper extremity (UE) coordination, bilateral coordination, balance, strength, running speed and agility (run/agility). A total of 42 boys completed the study with scores distributed between three age groups: Group 1=4-7 year olds; Group 2=8- 11 year olds; and Group 3=12-14 year olds. Exclusion criteria included a bleed within the last week that was unresolved or other physical limitation preventing participation. All severities of hemophilia were included in the study, but were not separately analysed in the results.

Results:

Each age group mean scores for the subtests were within the normal mean range of 15±4 except for strength in Group 2. Group 1 had some participants score above average for four of the subtests, while Group 2 and 3 only scored above average on one subtest. Group 1 had 6-18% score below average on four of the subtests while Group 2 had 27-47% and Group 3 had 30-50% score below average on all 5 subtests. No adverse events or bleeds occurred during or as a result of the gross motor testing.

Conclusion:

At our Hemophilia Treatment Center, more than 50% of the boys tested had gross motor dels. The percentage of boys showing deficits increased and persisted after age 7. This reinforces the need to include some standardized gross motor testing during the annual physical therapy evaluation of our patients with hemophilia to identify boys with scores below average and make referrals at an early age to prevent persisting gross motor delays.

Objective:

Functional impairment from recurrent joint bleeding in people with hemophilia results in joint pain and reduces quality of life. The P-FiQ study formally evaluated patient- and site-reported functional assessment including responses to generic and hemophilia-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs) tools. Psychometric analyses were used to evaluate reliability, validity, and consistency of responses.

Methods:

Adult males with hemophilia and a history of joint pain or bleeding completed a hemophilia history and 5 PROs assessing function: EQ-5D-5L, Brief Pain Inventory v2 Short Form (BPI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Short Form-36 v2 (SF-36v2), and Hemophilia Activities List (HAL). PROs were assessed for reliability, consistency, and correlation, with factors including patient-reported characteristics.

Summary:

A total of 381 adults (median age, 34 years; range, 18-86 years) were enrolled in P-FiQ. Most participants (66%) and sites (59%) reported functional disability in the past 6 months (CDC-UDC scale). Patients self-reported arthritis/bone/joint problems (65%) and history of joint procedures or surgeries (50%). On EQ-5D-5L, most reported problems “today” with mobility (61%) and usual activities (53%) but fewer with self-care (19%). On BPI, similar median pain interference scores (0- 10 scale, 10 is complete interference) were reported with general activity (3.0), walking ability (3.0), and normal work (3.0). On IPAQ, physical activity was reported by 49% of respondents over the prior week, with more reporting walking (35%) than moderate (16%) or vigorous (16%) activities. On SF-36v2, activities in the past 4 weeks that were most frequently limited were vigorous activities (80%), bending, kneeling, or stooping (67%), walking more than a mile (61%), and climbing several flights of stairs (59%). Physical problems caused participants to limit kinds of work/activities (69%), accomplish less than they would like (66%), have difficulty in performing work/activities (65%), and reduce time spent on work/activities (62%). On HAL, greater difficulties were seen for lower vs upper extremity functions/activities; within the lying/sitting/kneeling/standing domain, the most frequent problems in the previous month were squatting for a long time (74%), kneeling (73%) or standing (72%), and kneeling/squatting (70%). Similar items across different PROs were correlated with one another. Self- reported functional impairment was significantly differentiated by BPI pain interference, IPAQ total activity, SF-36v2 physical functioning, and all HAL domains and summary scores.

Conclusion:

PRO instruments assessing functional status range from simple/generic (EQ-5D-5L) to complex/disease-specific (HAL) and provide varying levels of detail. Greater use of formal PRO instruments in the clinical setting may improve dialogue between health care professionals and patients/caregivers and inform proactive approaches to specifically target patient identified functional limitations (eg, HAL) and identify areas for further targeted management strategies.

Objective:

People with hemophilia frequently experience joint bleeds, resulting in pain and functional impairment. The P-FiQ study formally evaluated patient-reported pain descriptions, responses to standardized patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to pain, and pain management strategies.

Methods:

Participants completed a pain/hemophilia history and 5 PRO instruments. Pain was assessed via 3 PRO instruments: EQ-5D-5L, Brief Pain Inventory v2 Short Form (BPI), and Short Form-36 v2 (SF- 36v2), and these instruments were assessed for reliability, consistency, and correlation with factors including patient-reported characteristics.

Summary:

P-FiQ enrolled 381 adult males with mild-severe hemophilia and a history of pain and/or joint bleeding. Most (65%) self-reported having arthritis/bone/joint problems. Thirty-two percent of participants reported experiencing both acute and chronic pain, 35% chronic pain only, 20% acute pain only, and 15% no pain. Of those reporting acute pain, most described the sensation as “sharp” (77%) or “aching” (65%); for those reporting chronic pain, most described the pain as “aching” (80%) or “nagging” (50%). Ankles (37%) and knees (24%) were commonly reported as the most painful joints. Many participants with acute/chronic pain reported using acetaminophen (62%/55%) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (34%/49%) to treat their pain in the past 6 months. Some participants indicated having moderate/severe/extreme (28%/12%/2%) pain/discomfort “today” as measured by the EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort domain. For BPI (scale 0-10, 10 is most severe pain), median pain severity scores were 6.0 for worst pain, 3.0 for average pain, 2.0 for current pain, and 1.0 for least pain. Median BPI pain interference scores indicated interference with general activity (3.0), mood (3.0), walking ability (3.0), normal work (3.0), and enjoyment of life (2.0). On SF-36, most participants (90%) reported experiencing bodily pain, and 75% indicated that pain interfered with normal work in the last 4 weeks. Assessments of pain on PROs were highly correlated with one another. The following formal PRO assessments were associated with self-reported pain: pain/discomfort domain of EQ-5D-5L, BPI worst pain, least pain, average pain, and current pain, and SF-36 bodily pain. Greater extent of lifetime routine infusions was also associated with EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort and SF-36 bodily pain.

Conclusion:

Pain severity and interference in people with hemophilia were identified consistently across several PROs, and correlated with patient-reported pain. In the comprehensive care setting, greater use of formalized assessment tools over time would improve dialogue and pain assessment between healthcare professionals and patients, document and validate the presence and extent of pain, establish and monitor individual goals for pain management interventions, and encourage the exploration of various pain management strategies and the evaluation of their overall quality and effectiveness.

Objective:

The B-HERO-S study assessed the impact of hemophilia on US adults with hemophilia B, including affected females. Here we describe the symptoms, management, and impact on education, employment, and engagement in recreational activities in women.

Methods:

Adults aged ≥18 years with hemophilia B (factor IX <40%) completed a survey including questions about bleeding, treatment, and psychosocial impact.

Summary:

Of 299 respondents, 86 were women (median age, 29 years; 6% were aged >45 years) with mild (29%), moderate (65%), or severe (6%) hemophilia. The majority reported arthritis (66%) and anxiety/depression (57%); 19% reported acute and/or chronic pain. Most (86%) were treated with some form of “routine infusions to prevent bleeding”; 16% reported self-infusing, 31%/17% by partners/family. Self-infusion was initiated at median age of 18, and learned from HTCs (86%), camps (71%), or parents (57%). Most reported difficulty with access to factor due to affordability/availability in the past 5 years (72%) or expected in the next 5 years (85%). Women reported a median (mean) of 4 (3.86) bleeds in prior year; 83% bled within the last 4 weeks with most recent bleeding in joints (73%) or muscles (21%). Twenty-five percent reported one specific “bad” joint, most commonly the knee (69%). Nearly all were seen in HTCs (85%) with a median (mean) of 3 (3.5) HTC visits per year. Most (88%) went past high school with 55% completing 4-year college and 24% graduate degrees. Most (94%) reported some negative impact on completing their education (7% very large/69% moderate/19% small impact), most commonly due to difficulties concentrating at school due to bleeds or pain (81%). Most were employed full-time (71%) or part-time (10%), commonly in office work (71%). Most (94%) reported a negative impact on their working life (3% very large/71% moderate/20% small impact); 36% reported leaving a job because of their hemophilia. Nearly all (99%) indicated some negative impact on their ability to engage in recreational activities (3% large/83% moderate/13% small impact). From a list of predetermined activities, dancing (50%) and walking (48%) were the most common current activities; bicycling (20%), dancing (17%), and swimming (16%) were the most common discontinued activities. Most reported treatment changes around activities (21% started prophylaxis, 52% revised time of doses, 38% added doses, 34% changed amount of doses); 8% reported no change and 3% no moderate/vigorous activities.

Conclusion:

Clinical presentation and treatment in women mirrored that reported by men except for greater anxiety/depression and more issues with access to treatment. Nearly all affected women reported a negative impact on their education, employment, and activities. While these results may be limited by bias in recruitment selecting those most symptomatic, the data reveal opportunities to improve awareness of and guidance around management and counselling of affected women.

Objective:

The B-HERO-S study evaluated the impact of mild-severe hemophilia B on the lives of affected adults and children. Here we assess the impact of hemophilia B on relationships.

Methods:

US adults with hemophilia B and caregivers of affected children completed separate 1-hour online surveys that included questions regarding impact on interpersonal relationships.

Summary:

Most (88%) of the 299 adults completing the survey had mild-moderate hemophilia B. Of those, 54% were married or in a long-term relationship, and 44% were single. Most adults (87%) reported that hemophilia impacted their ability to form close relationships with partners or prospective partners; 35% were very/quite dissatisfied with the support received from a previous partner. Ninety percent reported that their experiences in a prior relationship, including satisfaction with support from their previous partner, impacted their decision to enter a relationship with their current partner. Nearly all participants (98%) were very/quite satisfied with the support received from their current partner. The top reason for satisfaction was “my partner takes the lead in providing financial security” (45%). Most were very/quite satisfied with the support from family (87%) and friends (96%). Most participants reported a negative reaction or experience as a result of disclosing their hemophilia (friend/colleague/employer, 76%/80%/82%); some reported having felt bullied by peers/colleagues (69%/66%). Majorities reported that past experiences impacted which friends/colleagues they told about their hemophilia, and how or when they disclosed their hemophilia status to these individuals (97%/95%). Seventy-four percent of participants indicated that hemophilia has affected the quality of their sex life; only 54% were extremely/moderately satisfied with their overall sexual relationship. Many reported having had a bleed during sex (40%). Of 150 caregivers of children with mostly mild-moderate hemophilia (74%), 89% were married or in a long-term relationship, and most felt very/quite supported by their partner (98%) and family (87%). Impact on unaffected siblings was more often mixed (49%) than negative (18%). Most felt very/quite satisfied with support of teachers (91%), children at school (80%), and other adults in regular contact (72%). Most caregivers reported negative experiences telling a friend (76%) or having their child tell a friend (69%) about the child’s hemophilia; 43% reported that their child was bullied as a result of having hemophilia.

Conclusion:

While the impact of severe hemophilia on relationships has been reported in HERO and other studies, B-HERO-S suggests that mild-moderate hemophilia B also significantly impacts relationships of affected men/women and boys/girls, especially in terms of disclosure, intimacy, and feeling bullied by peers/colleagues. Opportunities may be explored to more proactively counsel individuals with mild-moderate hemophilia B and families in the setting of comprehensive care to better navigate interpersonal relationships and improve quality of life.

Background/Objective:

Hemophilia is a bleeding disorder caused by the body’s inability to accomplish the natural clotting process. People with hemophilia experience bleeds because there is an inadequate amount of thrombin due to a deficiency in factor VIII or IX. Thrombin is critical to clotting and sealing the wound; it converts fibrinogen into fibrin, establishing a network to help more platelets accumulate. Thrombin activity is regulated by antithrombin. Fitusiran is a subcutaneously administered investigational RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic targeting antithrombin with the goal of improving thrombin generation to promote clotting in people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. Interim data from the Phase 1 study showed fitusiran was generally well tolerated and administration of monthly fitusiran led to dose-dependent antithrombin lowering, improvement in thrombin generation, and decrease in bleeding frequency. We will report interim safety, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of fitusiran from the Phase 2 extension study.

Methods:

The Phase 2 extension study (NCT02554773) includes people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, previously dosed in the Phase 1 (NCT02035605) study. Participants receive monthly, fixed subcutaneous doses of fitusiran, 50 mg or 80 mg. Primary endpoints include safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints include antithrombin activity, thrombin generation and exploratory evaluation of bleed events.

Summary of Results:

As of May 2017, 33 participants were enrolled in the study and had received continuous dosing of up to 14 months. Previously reported data showed that fitusiran was generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse events related to study drug and no thromboembolic events. Once-monthly subcutaneous dosing achieved dose-dependent antithrombin lowering of ~80% and thrombin generation levels approaching levels similar to participants without hemophilia. Exploratory post-hoc analysis of bleed events showed median annualized bleed rate (ABR)=1 in participants without inhibitors and median ABR=0 in participants with inhibitors. Bleed events were successfully managed with either replacement factors or bypassing agents. Updated safety, tolerability and clinical activity will be presented.

Conclusions:

Emerging clinical data suggest that fitusiran may be a promising investigational prophylactic therapy to promote appropriate clotting and reduce the frequency of bleeding in people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors.

Background:

Congenital FXD is a rare bleeding disorder characterized by spontaneous joint and mucocutaneous bleeding and gastrointestinal or intracranial hemorrhage. pdFX is a US- and EU-approved treatment for congenital FXD, but data in children <12 years have been unavailable.

Aims:

To investigate pdFX efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in children <12 years with moderate to severe congenital FXD.

Methods:

In this 6-month, open-label, multicenter, phase 3, prospective study in children <12 years, all subjects had a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe congenital FXD (basal FX:C <5%), severe bleeding history, or an F10 gene mutation causing a documented severe bleeding type. Subjects received routine prophylaxis at recommended 40–50 IU/kg twice weekly to maintain trough FX:C levels ≥5%. Each investigator assessed efficacy based on standardized criteria and presence of breakthrough bleeding. All subjects provided informed consent and the protocol was approved by appropriate independent ethics committees.

Results:

Mean age of the 9 trial completers was 6.8 years. Eight subjects had severe and 1 had moderate FXD. Overall, 537 prophylactic infusions were administered; mean dose/child was 38.6 IU/kg. Ten bleeds in 3 of 9 children were reported: 6 minor, 3 major, 1 unassessed. Investigators rated overall pdFX efficacy as excellent in all subjects. Overall mean incremental recovery was 1.74 IU/dL per IU/kg. FX trough levels were maintained >5% after visit 4 (days 29–42) in all subjects.

A total of 28 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 8 children; none were considered pdFX related. No significant changes were noted in vital signs, physical exams, or laboratory measurements. No evidence of inhibitor development was seen.

Conclusion:

pdFX is efficacious in the prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in subjects <12 years with moderate to severe FXD. Safety profile in this population is consistent with previous results in subjects ≥12 years.

Funding: Bio Products Laboratory

Background:

The impact of family history on mothers of sons with hemophilia is unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether differences exist in perceived vulnerability of sons, protective behaviors toward sons and reported stress when comparing mothers of sons with hemophilia who have a known family history of hemophilia with mothers who have an unknown family history of hemophilia.

Methods:

We performed a prospective, single visit study of mothers who have a son with hemophilia. Following informed consent, participants answered demographic and family history questions and completed three surveys: the Parent Protection Scale, the Child Vulnerability Scale and the Parenting Stress Index.

Results:

A total of 39 participants completed the study, including 21 mothers with a known family history of hemophilia and 18 mothers with an unknown family history of hemophilia. No significant differences were found in perceived vulnerability, protective behavior and reported stress in mothers with a known family history of hemophilia compared to those without a known family history of hemophilia. However, the total Parent Protection Scale scores were significantly higher among mothers of sons with hemophilia with a history of inhibitor, compared to those without a history of inhibitor. Mothers of sons with hemophilia without siblings scored significantly higher on the Parent Protection Scale, Supervision and Control sub-scores, as well as the Parent Stress Index, Difficult Child sub-score. Child Vulnerability Scale scores increased along with the Parent Protection Scale, Dependence sub-scores and Separation sub-scores. Child Vulnerability Scale scores increased along with the total Parent Stress Index scores, as well as with increasing Parent Stress Index, Difficult Child sub-scores and Parent-child dysfunctional Interaction sub-scores.

Discussion:

Historically, social workers in hemophilia programs have observed psychosocial differences between mothers of sons with hemophilia who have a known versus unknown family history. We did not find differences in the measures we utilized between groups. Instead, the results of this study demonstrated the complex system of behaviors exhibited by all mothers of sons with hemophilia, enriching the understanding of the impact of family history of hemophilia when providing comprehensive care services to mothers of sons with hemophilia and families.

Implications/Next Steps:

The results of this study will lead to the improvement of hemophilia center clinical social work assessment of family functioning, specifically the mother-son relationship. Further research needs to be initiated to explore the complex psychosocial differences in individual mothers of sons with hemophilia, individual sons with hemophilia, family systems and social systems impacted by hemophilia.

Objective:

Physicians prescribing Factor VIII for haemophilia A patients are presented with an array of dose and dose frequency in the package insert making it difficult to precisely prescribe. To clarify the treatment outcome across products, a model of the published half-life was used to provide the expected % IU/dl +/- SD at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours post dose at a normalized dose and at the high end of the recommended dosage (dose and freq.).

Methods:

Eleven rFVIII products recently marketed in the US were assessed using a model of the halflife +/- SD to calculate the expected %IU/dl +/- SD at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hrs post-dose. Terminal half-life data for adults was obtained from each published package insert (PI). The one-stage clotting assay data was used for all except Afstyla© (chromogenic assay only). Variance reported as coefficient of variation or confidence intervals was converted to standard deviation.

The first comparison was made using a standard dose of 50 IU/kg across all products. The second comparison used the maximum recommended dose and frequency for routine prophylaxis defined in the PI. Full data sets and curves of %IU/dl+/-SD under standard doses of 50 IU/kg and under maximum dose and frequency for routine prophylaxis have been generated.

Summary:

Graphing the single dose comparison (50 iu/kg) revealed 3 general clusters and one outlier at 24 hrs post dose. The first cluster had 4 products with a mean range of 21-25 %IU/dl at 24 hrs post dose. The second cluster had 5 products with a range of 30-32 %IU/dl at 24 hrs. The third cluster had 1 product (Eloctate©) with 43% IU/dl at 24 hrs. The outlier (Nuwiq©) showed exceptional variance compared to others and removed from discussion.

Expected %IU/dl was recalculated using the most frequent and highest dose recommended for individual products. Assessing the –SD value: 10 of 10 products achieved > 1% trough at 24 hrs; 8 of 10 at 48 hrs; 2 of 10 at 72 hrs; and 1 of 10 at 96 hrs. Note at 72hrs, only 2 of 10 products achieve minimal trough at –SD level when 4 of 10 claim q3day dosing.

Conclusions:

Initial dosing for routine prophylaxis relies on the mean half-life. The PK parameters are based on only 18 to 30 patients under well-controlled conditions. There is waste on both sides of the PK half-life distribution curve. Would it be reasonable to assure minimal breakthrough bleeds and less over-dosage by initiating treatment with a personal PK profile for each patient in order to identify the correct dose and frequency? This model could be used to find optimal dose and frequency with input from a personalized product half-life.

Background:

Gene transfer for hemophilia offers the potential to convert the disease from a severe to mild phenotype with a single treatment. AMT-060 consists of an AAV5 vector containing a codon-optimized wildtype hFIX gene under control of a liver-specific promoter.

Objective:

This phase 1/2 study investigates the safety and efficacy of AMT-060 at 2 dose levels in adults with moderate-severe or severe hemophilia B.

Methods:

Multi-national, open-label, dose-escalating study in patients with factor IX (FIX) activity ≤2% of normal, and a severe bleeding phenotype (prophylactic exogenous FIX; or ondemand exogenous FIX, plus ≥4 bleeds/year or hemophilic arthropathy). Patients received either 5x1012 gc/kg (n=5) or 2×1013 gc/kg (n=5) of AMT-060 iv. Efficacy assessments include endogenous FIX activity (measured ≥10 days after use of exogenous FIX); reduction of exogenous FIX use; and annualized spontaneous bleeding rates. Safety assessments include treatment related adverse events, immunological and inflammatory biomarkers.

Summary:

There were no screening failures due to AAV5 neutralizing antibodies. Mean FIX activity in the lower dose cohort was 5.2% (min-max, 3.0-6.8%; n=4; 1 patient remaining on prophylaxis excluded) during 1 year of follow-up, and 6.9% (min-max, 3.1-12.7%; n=5) in the higher dose cohort during 26 weeks follow-up. Eight of 9 patients on FIX prophylaxis discontinued use after AMT-060 infusion. Follow-up to up to 1.5 years will be presented, with annualized reduction of exogenous FIX use and spontaneous bleeding rates. Mild, temporary elevations in ALT were observed in 3 patients with higher mean FIX activity (6.3-12.7%; 1 in the lower and 2 in the higher dose cohort). Each received a tapering course of prednisolone. ALT elevations were not associated with changes in FIX activity or a capsid-specific T-cell response.

Conclusions:

Patients continue to show sustained clinical benefit and endogenous FIX activity with no T-cell activation ≥1 year after a single infusion of AMT-060.

Background:

Factor VIII (FVIII) pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and other patient characteristics may play a role in effectiveness of FVIII prophylaxis. Objective: A post-hoc analysis was conducted to assess the association between PK parameters and BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry® ) prophylaxis regimen in patients with severe hemophilia A.

Methods:

LEOPOLD I was a randomized, open-label, phase 2/3 trial to investigate use of BAY 81-8973 routine prophylaxis for treatment of bleeds in adolescents and adults with severe hemophilia A. In the efficacy part of the trial (part B), patients received BAY 81-8973 at a dose of 20‒50 IU/kg 2x/week (n=18) or 3x/week (n=44) for 12 months. Prophylaxis regimens were determined by study investigators, independent of BAY 81-8973 PK data. A subset of 20 patients (2x/week, n=7; 3x/week, n=13) had data from an earlier PK study (part A), in which patients received a single 50-IU/kg injection of BAY 81-8973 and had blood samples collected over 48 hours to assess PK parameters, including area under the curve (AUC), half-life (t½), and clearance (CL). Estimates of PK parameters were also derived using a population PK model based on data from all patients. This analysis compared model-based PK parameters, baseline characteristics, total annual dosing, and bleed outcomes between 2x/week and 3x/week prophylaxis groups. A similar analysis was done among the subset of patients in part A who had PK data. Differences between 2x/week and 3x/week dosing were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables, and chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables.

Results:

In the full trial population, model-based AUC [mean (SD): 1957.1 (648.3) vs 2139.1 (875.7), 2x/week and 3x/week, respectively], t½ [15.0 (3.7) vs 15.9 (6.6)], and CL [0.028 (0.009) vs 0.027 (0.011)] were comparable between groups. The proportion of patients with ≥3 bleeds at 12 months was 33% for 2x/week and 48% for 3x/week. The 3x/week group had more bleeds in the past 12 months, higher baseline Gilbert bleeding scores, were more likely to have target joints at baseline, and received higher doses of BAY 81-8973 during the 12- month treatment period. In the part A subset analysis, observed and model-based AUC, t½, and CL were similar in both groups. The proportion of patients with ≥3 bleeds at 12 months was 0% for 2x/week and 46.2% for 3x/week (P=0.052).

Conclusions:

The similarity of PK parameters in patients successfully treated with 2x/week and 3x/week regimens suggests that clinical factors other than t½, AUC, and CL are important in predicting success of prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973. Physician decisions, taking into consideration clinical factors to identify appropriate patients for specific prophylaxis regimens, appear to be an important factor for 2x/week or 3x/week dosing with BAY 81-8973. These factors should be considered when individualizing BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis frequency.

Aim:

The goal of this project was to gather data and identify factors affecting access to dental care for people with bleeding disorders in the United States.

Methods:

The Arizona School of Dentistry and Oral Health and the National Hemophilia Foundation conducted a joint survey. The survey was completed by 102 of the 147 hemophilia treatment centers (HTC) in the USA. This represents 69% of the HTC’s in the country. Each HTC provided specific information concerning the dental services and education provided for patients.

Summary:

Survey results revealed inconsistent levels of oral health services available to patients. Major factors limiting access to care include finances, patient anxiety and a lack of providers with the skills to treat this population.

Conclusion:

Improvement in oral health for persons with bleeding disorders requires appropriate education for providers, patients and families. Additionally, both public and private health funding must be re-evaluated as it relates to people with bleeding disorders.

Background:

Activity limiting joint disease has greatly decreased with the introduction of prophylactic treatment for people with severe bleeding disorders. Previous research using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2TM), a standardized, normative, age and sex matched test of motor development, suggested motor development of males aged 4-21 years with bleeding disorders may be lower than age-matched peers.

Objective:

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the gross motor proficiency of boys with hemophilia ages 4-21 years followed at the Hemophilia Center at Oregon Health & Science University utilizing the BOT-2. Secondarily, we examined the relationship between joint health and gross motor proficiency.

Methods:

1. a)  Participants and setting: Thirty-four subjects with either hemophilia A or B were recruited

   from our center. Data collection occurred during clinic visits or at the patients’ homes.

2. b)  Design and Procedures: A prospective, cross-sectional study design was used. The Upper Limb Coordination, Bilateral Coordination, Balance, Running Speed and Agility, and Strength subtests of the BOT-2 were administered. Body composition, range of motion, presence of an inhibitor, and use of prophylaxis were collected at the time of testing or from chart review.

3. c)  Analyses: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) modeling was used to compare BOT-2 scores of PWH with baseline BOT-2 scores estimated from the general population of comparable age.

Summary:

Mean Running Speed & Agility scores were greater among boys with hemophilia compared to the control population (p=0.0026). Agility scores were similar between boys with hemophilia A and B (p>0.60), and significantly greater compared to the control group (p=0.0153). No other significant differences were found comparing boys with hemophilia to the control group. Within the boys with hemophilia cohort, age-adjusted ANOVA found no significant differences in BOT-2 scores between subjects of different severities, treatment regimen (prophylaxis or episodic), or diagnoses (Hemophilia A or B).

Conclusion:

Boys with hemophilia have the same or better gross motor proficiency as age matched peers.

Attainment of self-management skills, disease knowledge, and a documented transition plan are key elements for smooth transfer from pediatric to adult care for patients with chronic disease. Our hemophilia center had no standardized approach for assessing key patient competencies or independence readiness. In the last quarter of 2014, our team undertook a quality improvement project; we developed a transition tool with the goals of consistently assessing self-efficacy skills at a sustained rate of 90% during annual comprehensive visits; and developing patient-centric skill-building plans based on these assessments.

We previously reported that after four PDSA ramps of tool utilization, 31 patients, age 2-21 years, had been seen in hemophilia comprehensive clinic during the 3 month period studied. Utilizing the newly developed tool, 97% had a global assessment of competency with respect to their current age group; 93% had transition or progress plans documented. This demonstrated significant improvement compared with retrospective data from the three month period prior to implementation of the tool.

Since this previous report, we have continued to utilize the tool during hemophilia comprehensive clinic. In the proposed poster, we will demonstrate sustainability of the tool through analysis and presentation of Hemo-milestone data from the first half of 2015. Further, based on these results we will propose additional areas of study inspired by the transition tool, with the aim of continued improvement of the skill-building and transition process. These include improved utilization of educational materials based on identified learning needs; evaluation of documented, planned interventions; the development of collaborative educational events with our partner adult HTC; and retrospective, patient- centered evaluation of the transition process after the transition to adult hemophilia care.

Objective:

Personalizing treatment to a patient’s lifestyle and promoting overall health and wellness in persons with hemophilia (PWH) is essential to optimizing outcomes. There is limited evidence that correlates how activity and infusions impact bleeding episodes and further data on this relationship is needed. The research objective of SPACE is to prospectively explore the association between activity level, timing of infusion, and occurrence of a bleeding episode in PWH using novel technology.

Methods:

This six-month prospective, observational study includes PWH A or B in the United States currently receiving ADVATE or RIXUBIS between the ages of 13 and 65 years. Enrolled PWH use a smartphone eDiary application to log information on activities, infusions, and bleeding episodes. As an additional measurement of activity, enrollees are given a FitBit, a consumer-based activity tracker that measures steps taken and calories burned. Activity types are assessed based on their level of perceived risk for collision, according to the NHF “Playing It Safe” brochure. We report here current study status and descriptive analysis of baseline data.

Results:

The interim analysis included 15 patients with a median age of 19 (Range: 13 to 47). At baseline, 87% of patients were on prophylaxis and 13% treated on-demand treatment. Fifty-three percent of patients had 0 target joints at baseline. Eighty-seven percent of patients indicated that they had discussed activity participation with their physician. Sixty-seven percent of patients considered themselves ‘very satisfied’ or ‘satisfied’ with their level of activity. Data collected from the FitBit indicated that patients in SPACE walked on average 7,367 (SD: 3250) steps per day and burned 979 (SD: 398) calories from their activity. For patients on prophylaxis, the mean number of days per week doing mild, moderate and strenuous activity were 3.57, 2.64, and 1.5 respectively. Of the data reported on bleeding episodes, 40% of patients reported no bleeds at the time of the interim analysis. Forty percent of patients did not report having a bleed at the time of the interim analysis. Of all bleeds reported, 34% were associated with physical activity.

Conclusions:

Current data from SPACE demonstrates that subjects are active and participating in various activities. Continued data will provide better understanding of the types of activities and infusion schedules that may be associated with risk as well as protective effects on bleeding episodes by infusing prior to activity. A personalized approach to treatment based on physical activity levels may minimize bleeding risk in PWH.

Background:

Until recently, the hemophilia B community has only had standard Factor IX (FIX-Fc) products as treatment choices. With the availability of additional standard rFIX products and extended half-life (EHL) rFIX-Fc, there has been much debate (1-4) regarding clinical and cost expectations, balanced with optimizing use in patients. To level the debate, an understanding of real-world prescription costs of patients who switch to EHL FIX-Fc products is warranted.

Objectives:

1) To characterize patients who switch from rFIX to EHL rFIX-Fc, and 2) to understand their change in factor costs.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis using national US specialty pharmacy dispensing databases from Jan 1, 2013-Apr 25, 2015 of Hemophilia B (ICD-9 code 286.1) individuals who switched from rFIX to rFIX-Fc. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics. Patients who had at least 90 days of prescription coverage on both products were included. Utilization was averaged on a monthly basis pre and post switch. Costs were calculated by multiplying the units by the wholesale acquisition prices for each product (Red Book) and the percentage change in cost from rFIX to EHL-rFIX was compared. This analysis studied patients who switched but stayed on similar regimens. Cohorts were characterized as prophylaxis to prophylaxis (P to P), or on-demand to on-demand (OD to OD).

Results:

Sixteen switchers were included in the study. Hemophilia severity was reported as 62.5% severe, 12.5% moderate, 6.25% mild, and 18.75% of unknown severity. The P to P cohort comprised of the majority of patients at 87.5% (n=14) while OD to OD were smaller at 11% (n=2). The median ages for these cohorts were similar. The P to P median age was 15 (range: 5-51) and OD to OD was 14 (range: 13-15) years old. Median prescription costs increased in the P to P cohort by 40% (range: -56% to 181%), while OD to OD increased by 173% (range: 1% to 348%).

Conclusion:

While the availability of EHL rFIX-Fc allows hemophilia B patients an option with less frequent infusions, our findings demonstrate that for those who initially switched from prophylaxis to prophylaxis or from on-demand to on-demand regimens, costs increased for the majority of patients. This analysis provides initial real-world cost data for those who have switched to EHL and may be helpful in decision makers’ understanding of the value of EHL rFIX-Fc in hemophilia B.

Objective:

BAX 855 is an extended half-life recombinant Factor VIII based on ADVATE. It was developed as an option to further personalize care and improve outcomes in people with hemophilia A. As a new therapy, it is important to understand patient satisfaction and preferences relative to their prior treatment. The objective of this research was to describe patient satisfaction with and preference for their prior FVIII therapy and BAX 855 as reported in the pivotal trial.

Methods:

BAX 855 was studied in a 6-month, phase 2/3, multi-center, open label study. Subjects in Arm A received 45 ± 5 IU/kg of BAX 855 twice weekly while subjects in Arm B infused BAX 855 on-demand. Patient preference and satisfaction were included as exploratory endpoints. Patient satisfaction was captured with the following options describing their treatment: very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied at baseline for their prior FVIII therapy and at follow-up for BAX 855. Patient preference for BAX 855 or their prior FVIII therapy was captured at follow-up. Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained. The percent of very satisfied and satisfied patients were combined for this analysis. Results were reported for all patients and by treatment arm.

Summary:

138 patients were in the intent to treat (ITT) sample. The majority of patients in the ITT sample completed the satisfaction questionnaire, however the number varied slightly by question and visit. While 79.4% (100 of 126) of patients were satisfied with their prior FVIII at baseline, satisfaction increased to 90.1% (109 of 121) with BAX 855 and 84.7% (100 of 118) preferred BAX 855 over their prior FVIII. Of the 85 patients in Arm A previously on prophylaxis, 18 patients in Arm A previously on-demand, and 15 patients in Arm B previously on-demand, 83.5%, 88.9% and 86.7% preferred BAX 855 over their prior FVIII, respectively.

Conclusion:

Notably, patients enrolled in the BAX 855 trial had a high degree of satisfaction with their prior FVIII therapy. Nonetheless, treatment with BAX 855 was successful in further improving patient satisfaction with the majority of patients preferring it over their prior FVIII product.

Objective:

To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of the first high- purity, plasma-derived factor X concentrate (pdFX) for on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes in a prospective, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized phase 3 study in subjects with hereditary moderate or severe factor X (FX) deficiency (basal plasma FX activity <5 IU/dL).

Methods:

Included subjects were aged ≥12 years who required treatment with replacement therapy for ≥1 spontaneous or menorrhagic bleed in the past 12 months. Subjects received 25 IU/kg of pdFX on-demand for specific bleeds or as preventative use for 6 months to 2 years. PK was assessed following a single dose at baseline and after ≥6 months. Each bleed was categorized as major or minor, and subjects assessed efficacy for each bleed as “excellent,” “good,” “poor,” or “unassessable”; hospital- treated bleeds were also assessed by investigators. At study end, each investigator assessed the overall efficacy of pdFX. Safety assessments were adverse events (AEs), inhibitor development, viral seroconversions, and changes in laboratory parameters.

Summary:

The study enrolled 16 subjects (aged 12-58 years [mean 27.1 years], 62.5% female) with moderate (n=2) and severe (n=14) FX deficiency. PK parameters did not differ between baseline and repeat assessment visits, with overall mean (median, interquartile range [IQR]) incremental recovery of 2.00 (2.12, 1.79-2.37) IU/dL per IU/kg and half-life of 29.4 (28.6, 25.8-33.1) hours. In total, 468 pdFX infusions were administered; 187 bleeds treated with pdFX were analyzed for efficacy (98 major and 88 minor), of which 155 (82.9%) were treated with one pdFX infusion. A mean (standard deviation) of 1.2 (0.5) infusions per bleed were administered, with a median (IQR) dose of 25.0 (24.4-26.7) IU/kg. Efficacy of pdFX was rated as excellent in 90.9% of bleeds, good in 7.5%, and poor in 1.1%. For the 15 subjects who completed the study, investigators rated overall pdFX efficacy as excellent in 12 (80%) and good in 3 subjects (20%). Six mild/moderate AEs were observed, no serious AEs were considered by investigators to be possibly related to study drug, and no hypersensitivity reactions or clinically significant trends in any laboratory safety parameters were observed.

Conclusions:

In this study, pdFX was safe and efficacious in on-demand treatment of bleeds and short-term preventative therapy in subjects with moderate or severe FX deficiency at a nominal dose of 25 IU/kg. PK results supported these observed hemostatic effects.

Background and Objective:

Standard outcome measures in hemophilia, such as the annual bleeding rate, have inherent limitations in both clinical practice and in research, including lack of both sensitivity and personalization. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is a method for evaluating outcome that is patient-centered and sensitive to change in individuals and populations; collaborative goal setting may also be viewed through the biopsychosocial lens as a potential resource to strengthen disease-related coping. GAS has been used successfully in several disease areas. However, feasibility can be an issue. To address this, standardized goal attainment menus can be developed that preserve individualization, while allowing greater ease of use by non-experts. We initiated a process to develop a novel outcome measure in hemophilia, the GAS-Hem, by creating a goal attainment menu for patients living with hemophilia.

Methods:

We conducted 2 multidisciplinary workshops with participants from medicine, nursing, social work, and physical therapy (n=12). During the first workshop, we developed a list of goal areas, each with an associated set of descriptors of attainment levels. At the second workshop, a second group of experts (n=8) critically reviewed each goal to evaluate its importance and relevance for inclusion in the GAS-Hem.

Summary:

28 goal areas with associated descriptors of attainment levels were developed, covering 3 broad categories: ability to manage hemophilia, ability to recognize and treat complications, and ability to cope with the impact of hemophilia on daily life. Descriptors incorporated several key parameters for each goal (eg. skill level, desire for change, utilization of available resources) (Table).

Conclusions:

We developed a novel, patient- centered outcome measure for patients with hemophilia. A comprehensive, preliminary list of goal areas and attainment levels was successfully created. The next step will be to incorporate feedback from patients and families, after which a feasibility study will be conducted to evaluate content and construct validity and overall ease of use.

Table. Examples of Goal Areas and Descriptors

Introduction and Objectives:

The phase 3 A-LONG and Kids A-LONG studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes in subjects with severe hemophilia A. This subgroup analysis of A-LONG and Kids A-LONG examined bleeding frequency with rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in subjects with target joints at baseline.

Methods:

A-LONG (≥12 y) and Kids A-LONG (<12 y) subjects with a history of target joints (a major joint with ≥3 bleeding episodes in a 6-month period) who were previously treated with FVIII and received on-study rFVIIIFc prophylaxis were identified. Self-reported pre-study 12- month bleeding history and on-study annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for all bleeds were evaluated.

Results:

93/141 subjects in A-LONG and 13/69 subjects in Kids A-LONG had target joints at baseline. The most prevalent locations of pre-study target joints identified at baseline among subjects in A-LONG were the elbow (61.7%) and ankle (59.6%). Similarly, in Kids A-LONG, these were the ankle (69.2%) and elbow (30.8%). A total of 59.7% and 52.4% of subjects receiving individualized (Arm 1) and weekly (Arm 2) rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in A-LONG, respectively, and 53.8% of subjects receiving rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in Kids A-LONG with target joints at baseline had no target joint bleeding episodes on-study. Median on-study ABRs with rFVIIIFc prophylaxis tended to be lower than pre-study bleeding rates in subjects with target joints at baseline (Table).

Conclusions:

For subjects with severe hemophilia A who had target joints at baseline, rFVIIIFc prophylaxis lowered bleeding rates across age groups compared with pre-study FVIII treatment.

Objective:

To evaluate efficacy of IB1001 for perioperative management of bleeding under surgical circumstances in hemophilia B patients.

Methods:

The efficacy of IB1001 for perioperative management has been evaluated in a prospective, open-label, multicenter international study where 17 subjects (16 male PTPs and one female hemophilia B carrier) underwent 20 major surgical procedures. The PTPs were defined as patients with a minimum of 150 exposures to another factor IX preparation. The subjects had severe or moderately severe (factor IX level ≤ 2 IU/dL) hemophilia B without inhibitors, with exception of one mild hemophilia B female carrier. Efficacy of IB1001 was based on the surgeon’s assessment including estimation of blood loss as ‘less than expected’, ‘expected’, or ‘more than expected’ at the time of surgery and assessment of hemostasis at 12 and 24 hours post-surgery as ‘superior’, ‘adequate’, or ‘poorly controlled’. Transfusion requirements were also monitored.

Summary:

Thirteen major procedures in 12 male subjects were managed by bolus regimen, and 6 major procedures in 4 male subjects were managed by continuous infusion regimen. Mean loading dose for 13 major procedures managed by bolus regimen was 120 ± 11.4 IU/kg and mean maintenance bolus dose (given every 12 hours) was 59.7 ± 12.2 IU/kg. During the 24 hours following surgery, factor IX levels were successfully maintained over 60%, as intended. Factor IX levels at pre-infusion were 59.7% ± 15.9% at 12 hours after surgery and 54.4% ± 16.5% at 24 hours after surgery. For a major procedure in one female carrier, the bolus dose was 110 IU/kg, while the mean maintenance dose was 44.9 ± 7.0 IU/kg. Mean loading dose for 6 major procedures managed by continuous infusion regimen was 95.4 ± 14.5 IU/kg and the mean maintenance infusions were 7.1 ± 4.0 IU/kg/hr. In all major procedures, blood loss at the time of surgery was ‘expected’ or ‘less than expected’ as assessed by the surgeon. IB1001 was rated by the surgeon as ‘superior’ or ‘adequate’ in controlling hemostasis post-surgery, including 8 knee arthroplasties, two elbow arthroplasties, one knee amputation, one percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening, one open inguinal hernia repair, one tibiotalar fusion, two arthroscopic synovectomies, three debridements and one total hysterectomy/bilateral oopherectomy. There were no transfusions required perioperatively.

Conclusions:

At the time of surgery, blood loss was expected or less than expected after IB1001 treatment, while post-surgery effective hemostasis control was achieved following IB1001 treatment in hemophilia B patients.

Objective:

To evaluate efficacy of IB1001 with respect to breakthrough bleeding during prophylaxis and with respect to control of hemorrhaging in prophylaxis and on-demand treatment regimens in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia B.

Methods:

The efficacy of IB1001 has been evaluated in a prospective, open-label, uncontrolled multicenter international study in which a total of 68 male PTPs between 7 and 64 years of age received IB1001 either as prophylaxis or on-demand treatment. All subjects had severe or moderately severe (factor IX level ≤ 2 IU/dL) hemophilia B without inhibitors. There were 61 subjects who received prophylaxis [predominantly secondary or tertiary prophylaxis as defined by World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) guidelines] and 12 were treated on-demand during the study conduct. Both, the subjects and the study investigators rated the efficacy of IB1001 in management of bleeding episodes.

Summary:

The mean number of exposure days (ED) was 138.2 (median: 127.5 ED), including 55 subjects with ≥ 50 ED and 45 subjects with ≥ 100 ED. Subjects on prophylaxis received a mean intravenous dose of 55.0 ± 12.8 IU/kg IB1001 twice weekly, while subjects in the on- demand regimen received a mean dose of 60.0 ± 18.2 IU/kg IB1001. In the prophylaxis group, median annualized bleed rate (ABR) was 1.52, and in the on-demand group, median ABR was 16.39. There were 19/61 (31.1%) subjects on IB1001 prophylaxis who reported no bleeding episodes. A total of 508 bleeding episodes were treated with IB1001; 286 bleeds were recorded for patients on prophylaxis and 222 in the on-demand regimen. Majority of the bleeds (70.9%) resolved after a single IB1001 infusion, while 13% of the bleeds required two infusions. A minority of the bleeds (4.7%) required 5 or more infusions; these bleeds were predominantly related to trauma, target joints and/or muscle bleeds. Subjects rated efficacy of IB1001 as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ in 84% of all treated bleeding episodes. Of 414 subject visits where the efficacy of IB1001 was evaluated by the study investigators, 92% were rated as ‘effective’ in prevention and treatment of bleeding by IB1001.

Conclusions:

IB1001 is effective for the treatment of hemophilia B either as secondary or tertiary prophylaxis or on an episodic (on-demand) basis. Based on clinical trial data, IB1001 is effective in controlling breakthrough or episodic bleeding episodes.

Objective:

To analyze real world rFVIIIFc patient characteristics and treatment interval patterns in patients with hemophilia A based on specialty pharmacy dispensing records.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted using aggregate Specialty Pharmacy Provider (SPP) records from July 2014 through Mar 2015. SPP data included 63 different attributes for each prescription, including trade name, NDC, quantity shipped, prescribed infusion dose, days supplied, and dose frequency. Patients were considered eligible for the analysis if they received at least one shipment of rFVIIIFc for a prophylactic treatment regimen. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they were being treated episodically, for immune tolerance induction, or pharmacy records did not specify a prescribed infusion dose. Patients were categorized according to their age and dosing interval.

Summary:

The analysis included 405 hemophilia A patients that received at least one shipment of rFVIIIFc with a median age of 23 (range: 2-68) and median weight of 70 kg (range: 10-154kg). Eight percent of dispensing records were for patients less than 6 years of age, 29% were between 6 and 17 years of age, and 63% were 18 years or greater. Pharmacy dispensing records represented 179 distinct prescribers across 40 states. Dosing frequency ranged from four times weekly to beyond once-weekly, with every four days as the most common dosing interval, representing 33% of patient records. The median infusion frequency was every four days. Fifty percent of all patients had a dosing frequency of four days or greater. Of the patients receiving rFVIIIFc that had previous rFVIII dispensing records, the most common rFVIII dosing frequency was three times per week. The majority of patients previously on prophylaxis regimen with a rFVIII dosing frequency of three times per week had a decreased number of prophylactic infusions per week on rFVIIIFc; 4% of patients reduced infusion frequency to every 3 days, 44% of patients reduced infusion frequency to twice weekly, 30% of patients reduced infusion frequency to every 4 days, 10% of patients reduced infusion frequency to every 5 days.

Conclusions:

Current SPP dispensing records demonstrate that rFVIIIFc is being used in a broad patient population based on age range and geographical distribution. Patients with hemophilia A in the US may experience reductions in FVIII infusion frequency when they switch to rFVIIIFc, with conversion to an infusion frequency every four days as the most common treatment regimen and the recommended prophylaxis starting dose according to the US Prescribing Information.

Objective:

People with hemophilia (PWH) commonly self-infuse at home, and can provide valuable insights into device attributes. While Novo Nordisk initially launched recombinant activated FVII (NovoSeven® RT) with vial adaptors, these were replaced with prefilled diluent syringe (MixPro®) in 2013; rFVIII (NovoEight®) launched with MixPro® in the US in 2015. This market research study assessed PWH and caregiver perceptions and preferences between MixPro® and vial adaptors (original device).

Methods:

A market research study was conducted in Fall 2014, comprising 30-minute face- to-face interviews. In total, 38 PWH (≥18 years) and 29 caregivers of children with hemophilia participated in the study, from Italy (n=20), Spain (n=20) and the US (n=27). Participants were eligible if they regularly home-infused replacement factor, and were excluded if they had ever used rFVIIa or were already familiar with MixPro®.

Summary:

The mean age of participants was 27 years. Most had hemophilia A (84%) with the remainder having hemophilia B (16%), more received prophylaxis (73%) than on demand (27%), and most received rFVIII (73%). Other participants were treated with FIX or plasma- derived FVIII. One PWH had inhibitors and was treated with activated prothrombin complex concentrate. MixPro® was clearly and consistently preferred over vial adaptors, both overall and based on key criteria. Overall, 96% were confident that they could use the system correctly, 73% thought it was intuitive to use, and 93% thought it was easy to learn. When asked to rank 18 defined benefits in order of importance, ‘low contamination risk’ was deemed the most important; the only criteria where MixPro® was not superior were related to verifying mixed factor had been drawn into the syringe. MixPro® was most associated with being: quick, easy, and convenient to use; portable; and overall user friendly. Caregivers placed more emphasis on a device being suitable for a person with less strength, while PWH were more interested in portability and convenience. Results were generally consistent across sub- populations: PWH vs caregivers, and those treated on demand vs prophylaxis.

Conclusions:

MixPro® demonstrated clear advantages over vial adaptors, based on feedback from PWH and caregivers, with respondents reporting it easy to learn and use, and confident they could use it correctly. The results affirm the importance of continuing to innovate on devices in collaboration with the hemophilia community.

Objectives:

This trial evaluated the hemostatic efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of a recombinant VWF (rVWF) in adults with severe von Willebrand disease (VWD) (type 3 [VWF:Ag ≤ 3 IU/dL], severe type 1 [VWF:RCo< 20 IU/dL], 2A [VWF:RCo< 20 IU/dL], 2N [FVIII:C<10% ], 2B, or 2M).

Methods:

Bleeds were to be treated initially with rVWF and rFVIII (1.3:1 ratio), followed by rVWF alone (as long as FVIII:C >40%). Hemostatic efficacy was evaluated using a pre- defined 4-point rating scale (none=4, moderate=3, good=2, excellent=1). PK parameters for rVWF vs. rVWF:rFVIII were assessed in a randomized crossover design, and a 6-month repeated PK evaluation for rVWF alone.

Summary:

Of 31 subjects assigned to bleed treatment, 22 (17 type 3, 4 type 2A and 1 type 2N) experienced 192 bleeding episodes (several in multiple locations) that were treated with rVWF: 106 occurred in mucosal tissue (including 32 menorrhagic, 42 nasopharyngeal, 26 mouth/oral bleeds), 59 joint bleeds, 6 gastrointestinal bleeds, and 37 in other locations. Treatment success (mean efficacy rating <2.5) was achieved in all 22 subjects (100%; Clopper-Pearson exact 90% confidence interval: 87.3 to 100.0). ‘Excellent’ ratings were given for 186/192 (96.9%) bleeds (119/122 minor, 59/61 moderate, 6/7 severe, 2/2 unknown severity) and the remaining 3.1% were ‘good’. One infusion was effective in 81.8% of bleeds (median [range]: 1 [1-4] overall; 2 [1-3] for severe bleeds). The subject’s own assessment of treatment efficacy (an exploratory endpoint), was ‘excellent’ within 8 hours after the first infusion for 125/134 (93.3%), ‘good’ for 8/134 (6.0%) and ‘moderate’ for 1/134 (0.7%) bleeding episodes. A substantial increase in FVIII:C and sustained stabilization (> 40% by 6 hours, rising to >80% 24 hours post-infusion) was observed after infusion with rVWF. PK parameters for VWF Ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo, a surrogate for the platelet-dependent function of rVWF) were similar when rVWF was infused alone (mean T1/2 21.9 h vs. 19.6 h with rVWF:rFVIII). Eight adverse events (tachycardia, infusion site paraesthesia, ECG t wave inversion, dysgeusia, generalized pruritis, hot flush, chest discomfort and increased heart rate) in 5 subjects were assessed as related to rVWF. No inhibitor or anti-VWF binding antibody development was observed, and there were no thrombotic events or severe allergic reactions.

Conclusions:

rVWF was safe, well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of a variety of bleeding presentations in severe VWD. The sustained stabilization in FVIII:C after the initial infusion enables subsequent infusion of rVWF without rFVIII, when multiple infusions are required.

Objective:

Kids B-LONG was an open-label phase 3 study that evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of rFIXFc in previously treated children (aged <12 years; ≥50 prior exposure days [EDs] to FIX) with severe hemophilia B (≤2 IU/dL endogenous FIX) and no history of FIX inhibitors.

Methods:

Participants initiated prophylactic treatment with 50–60 IU/kg rFIXFc once-weekly; dose and interval adjustments were based upon PK data and bleeding frequency. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies). Key secondary outcomes included PK and annualized bleeding rate (ABR).

Summary:

The study enrolled 30 participants (<6 years of age, n=15; 6 to <12 years of age, n=15); 90% completed the study. Prestudy, all participants received FIX prophylaxis (23/30 were dosing ≥2x/week). The median time on study was 49.4 weeks; 24 participants had ≥50 rFIXFc EDs. No participant developed inhibitors to rFIXFc. The pattern of adverse events reported was typical of the population studied. There were no serious allergic reactions and no thrombotic events. No serious adverse events were assessed by the investigator as related to rFIXFc. The terminal half-life (geometric mean [95% CI]) of rFIXFc was 66.5 (55.9, 79.1) hours in the <6 years cohort (n=11) and 70.3 (61.0, 81.2) hours in the 6 to <12 years cohort (n=13). The geometric mean (95% CI) half-life of prestudy BeneFIX was 18.2 (15.5– 21.3) hours in the <6 years cohort (n=11) and 19.2 (17.6–20.9) hours in the 6 to <12 years cohort (n=9). Median (IQR) ABR was 1.97 (0.00, 3.13) overall, and 0.00 (0.00, 1.16) for spontaneous bleeds; 33.3% of participants reported no bleeds on study. At study end, 97% of participants were dosing once weekly. The median (IQR) total weekly prophylactic dose with rFIXFc was 59.4 (53.0, 64.8) IU/kg and 57.8 (51. 7, 65.0) IU/kg, in the <6 years and 6 to <12 years cohorts, respectively. The prestudy FIX median (IQR) total weekly prophylactic dose was 110.0 (58.0, 188.0) IU/kg and 100.0 (58.0, 120.0) IU/kg in the <6 years and 6 to <12 years cohorts, respectively. 75.0% of bleeding episodes were controlled with 1 infusion; 91.7% with 1 or 2 infusions (median average dose per infusion: 68.22 IU/kg).

Conclusions:

rFIXFc was safe and effective for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in children with severe hemophilia B. Study participants achieved low bleeding rates with extended-interval rFIXFc prophylaxis, while reducing their weekly prophylactic factor consumption compared with their prior FIX regimen.

Objective:

Clinical knowledge gaps of hemophilia can affect patient outcomes through delayed diagnosis/referral as well as improper monitoring and interventions. A study was undertaken to identify and characterize clinical practice gaps and confidence levels in the management of hemophilia specific to pediatricians.

Methods:

Building upon a previous assessment developed in 2014, an updated global, hemophilia-specific continuing medical education-accredited clinical practice assessment survey was developed utilizing current evidence-based consensus guidelines and best practices, including guidelines from the National Hemophilia Foundation and the World Federation of Hemophilia. The assessment included both knowledge- and case -based, multiple-choice questions that healthcare providers completed confidentially on-line between March 23, 2015 and April 9, 2015. Areas such as appropriate triggers for initiating prophylaxis and use of physical therapy were assessed. Responses from pediatric providers were de- identified and aggregated prior to analysis.

Summary:

660 pediatricians (30% of total respondents) completed the survey, from the following locales: North America (36%), Asia (23%), Europe (15%), Middle East (10%), Africa (7%), Central/South America (6%), and Australia (4%). Academic (31%), private practice (27%), community hospital (19%), community clinic (12%), and hemophilia treatment center (3%) practice settings were identified. Analysis of pediatricians who indicated professional interaction with hemophilia patients (87% of pediatrician respondents) demonstrated knowledge gaps including (% incorrect responses): classification of severity of hemophilia (37%); optimal use of prophylactic therapy, e.g., when to initiate (31%), at what dose (53%), prophylaxis in active patients (26%); likelihood of inhibitors (75%); using bypassing therapy (58%); comprehensive care model (61%); supporting overall joint health and quality of life (70%); and adherence (60%). A low level of confidence in the ability to identify when to use prophylaxis was reported among 31% of pediatricians. The top barriers to the administration of prophylaxis identified by the pediatric providers included lack of availability of FVIII or FIX concentrates, lack of venous access, and insurance coverage (29%, 22%, and 21% for respondents, respectively).

Conclusions:

This study demonstrated gaps in knowledge and confidence about the assessment and optimal care of hemophilia for pediatricians, suggesting that further education specific to the needs of these providers is warranted.

Background:

BAY 1093884 is a fully human monoclonal antibody against tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) developed as a bypass agent for hemophilia patients with inhibitors. It restores thrombin burst for stable clot formation in hemophilic conditions in vitro.

Aims:

The goal of this study was to elucidate the in vivo prophylactic hemostatic potency of BAY 1093884.

Methods:

The hemophilia A mouse tail vein transection model was used for this study to mimic the venous bleeding characteristics of severe hemophilia. Male hemophilia A mice (n=12/group) were treated prophylactically with escalating doses of BAY 1093884. All treatments were administered as single intravenous (IV) bolus at 4 different time courses prior to injury (1, 3, 5, and 7 days). Bleeding was induced by a 1.2-mm deep incision across the left lateral vein. Following injury, the animals were monitored hourly for moribundity for up to 9 hours and after 24 hours followed by euthanasia.

Results:

Efficacious doses of BAY 1093884 providing 50% protection for survival (ED50) for up to 6 days after IV bolus ranged from 0.6–2 mg/kg. In comparison, only 25% protection was achieved 6 days after the treatment with a very high dose of 1000 IU/kg of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII). The effect of a single IV dose of 18 mg/kg BAY 1093884 providing 80%–90% survival was maintained over 8 days (ED50 6 mg/kg), whereas a single IV dose of rFVIII failed to provide protection over an 8-day period.

Conclusions:

These studies demonstrate that BAY1093884 prevents bleeding and increases long-term survival to a greater degree than rFVIII in hemophilia A mice and may offer a convenient prophylactic treatment option for hemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in hemophilia A requires frequent administration because of the short half-life of FVIII. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugation is thought to extend FVIII half-life by decreasing hepatic clearance. BAY 94-9027 is a rationally designed B-domain–deleted (BDD) FVIII molecule with a 60-kDa PEG molecule attached to a specific amino acid (1804) to increase circulating half-life and reduce the exposure to epitopes reported to cause immunogenicity in the A3 domain while preserving full biological function. BAY 94-9027 is currently in clinical trials and has prolonged half-life and improved efficacy in animal models and humans.

To determine whether half-life extension with BAY 94-9027 is related to PEG steric hindrance, we first investigated whether PEG impacts BAY 94-9027 binding interactions. Direct binding of hybrid of kidney and B cells (HKB)11-derived FVIII, BAY 94-9027 or BDD-FVIII, was assessed by measuring the ability of a panel of immobilized monoclonal antibodies directed toward different FVIII domains to capture FVIII. Interactions with more physiologic partners were indirectly assessed by thrombin generation assay (TGA) and by an in vitro hepatocyte clearance assay.

Our results indicate that the presence of A3-directed PEG reduced BAY 94-9027 capture by immobilized antibodies directed toward FVIII regions at or near the site of conjugation. Capture by antibodies directed toward the A3 and C2 domains were most impacted, while those directed toward A1 and A2 still bound BAY 94-9027. The A3-specific C7F7 antibody showed ~50% lower capture of BAY 94-9027 vs BDD-FVIII at 20 ng/mL of FVIII. C7F7 capture of PEG-BDD-FVIII was further reduced when a di-PEG conjugate of BDD-FVIII was subjected to the same assay, again confirming that PEG sterically modulates PEG-BDD-FVIII reactivity to the antibody. To determine whether steric effects observed with PEG may impact FVIII function globally, TGA was performed with BAY 94-9027 spiked into FVIII-deficient plasma and subjected to 1 pM tissue factor initiation. By TGA, both BDD-FVIII and BAY 94- 9027 generated comparable peak thrombin levels, with EC50 values of 3.9 and 3.2 nM for BDD-FVIII and BAY 94-9027, respectively. These results indicate that the PEG did not disrupt activated PEG-BDD-FVIII interactions with its partners in the factor Xase enzyme complex, consistent with published PEG-BDD-FVIII efficacy. By hepatocyte clearance assay, PEG- BDD-FVIII clearance was reduced ~30-40% compared with BDD-FVIII, regardless of whether von Willebrand factor was present. This reduction in hepatocyte clearance is likely to contribute to the prolonged plasma half-life reported for BAY 94-9027.

Objective:

To evaluate the effect of bleeding episodes on hemophilia patient burden of illness using observational data.

Methods:

Between 2005-2007 and 2009-2012, the Hemophilia Utilization Group Studies Va and Vb, respectively, recruited patients from ten Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) in eleven states. Adult patients or parents of children with hemophilia A or B completed an initial survey assessing socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment regimen. Work absenteeism, underemployment due to hemophilia, and unpaid hemophilia-related caregiver time were recorded at regular intervals over two years to estimate indirect costs using the human capital approach. Direct costs were estimated using healthcare services utilization and drug dispensing records. All costs were annualized and converted to 2014 US dollars. Annual mean bleeding episodes were calculated from patient-reported number of bleeds recorded in follow-up interviews, and used to stratify patients into bleeding categories of 0, 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, and 10+ bleeds. Associations between bleeding episodes and healthcare utilization, work productivity losses, and total costs were analyzed in patient subgroups based on both severity and treatment regimen.

Results:

Of 477 recruited patients, 352 with complete healthcare utilization and dispensing records and at least three months of follow-ups were included. A larger proportion of hemophilia A patients had severe disease and used prophylaxis compared to those with hemophilia B, but no socio-demographic variables differed significantly between the groups. Among severe patients, adults compared to children and episodic treatment compared to prophylaxis users had significantly more average annual bleeds [respective mean(standard deviation): 16.24(13.9) vs 5.54(9.47), p<0.0001 and 15.69(12.65) vs 8.39(11.1), p<0.0001]. Nearly two-thirds of the 82 severe patients using episodic treatment (63.4%) had 10 or more annual bleeds. Higher bleeding categories (more annual bleeds) were significantly associated with higher annual mean indirect costs for mild/moderate patients using episodic treatment [mean range across categories: $423-$21,434 (p=0.0003)] and severe patients on prophylaxis [$6,467-$14,890 (p=0.005]. Increased bleeding was also significantly associated with higher mean total costs in episodic treatment users with mild/moderate disease [$17,373- $136,552 (p<0.0001)] and severe disease [$83,957-$226,614 (p=0.008)]. Across all subgroups, increased bleeding was associated with more emergency room visits, outpatient procedures, and missed days of work, oftentimes reaching statistical significance.

Conclusions:

A larger proportion of severe hemophilia patients treating episodically have poor bleed management compared to those on prophylaxis. Overall, higher bleeding frequency is associated with both higher direct and indirect costs for individuals with hemophilia A and B across disease severity and treatment regimen.

Introduction and Objectives:

In the phase 3 A-LONG and Kids A-LONG studies, subjects with severe hemophilia A receiving rFVIIIFc prophylaxis 1-2 times/week had low annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), with comparable pre-study and on-study weekly factor consumption for subjects previously on FVIII prophylaxis. This report evaluated the effect of rFVIIIFc on subjects’ physical activity across a variety of age groups using a subject-reported assessment.

Methods:

Subjects eligible for A-LONG (≥12 y) and Kids A-LONG (<12 y) were previously treated males with severe hemophilia A (<1 IU/dL endogenous FVIII activity). Subjects in A- LONG were enrolled into 1 of 3 arms: Arm 1, individualized prophylaxis; Arm 2, weekly prophylaxis; or Arm 3, episodic treatment. All subjects in Kids A-LONG received rFVIIIFc prophylaxis. There were no restrictions regarding physical activity. Physical activity assessments were conducted at Weeks 7, 14, 28, 38, 52, and end of study (A-LONG) and Weeks 2, 7, 12, 17, 22, 26, and end of study (Kids A-LONG). At each visit after their first rFVIIIFc dose, subjects were asked to report any changes in their activity levels relative to their prior study visit as: more (or more intensive), fewer (or less intensive), or about the same amount of physical activities. To summarize each subject’s change in physical activity during the study compared to baseline, subjects’ reports were classified into four groups: less, the same, more, or undetermined.

Results:

A total of 165 and 71 subjects enrolled in A-LONG and Kids A-LONG, respectively. Overall, the majority of subjects in A-LONG reported more or the same amount of physical activity, and few subjects reported less physical activity during the study (less, the same, more, undetermined in Arm 1 [n=117], 8%, 36%, 51%, 5%; Arm 2 [n=23], 9%, 48%, 39%, 4%; Arm 3 [n=23], 9%, 52%, 26%, 13%, respectively). Results were generally similar for subjects in Kids A-LONG (for subjects aged <6 y [n=35], 3%, 26%, 66%, 6%; for subjects aged 6 to <12 y [n=34], 9%, 26%, 56%, 9%).

Conclusions:

The majority of subjects in A-LONG and Kids A-LONG reported similar or increased physical activity levels during the studies, while maintaining low ABRs. These self- reported data suggest that subjects across a variety of age groups with severe hemophilia A who are transitioning to rFVIIIFc may maintain or increase physical activity levels, while reducing infusion frequency and maintaining similar weekly factor consumption, without compromising efficacy.

Introduction:

BAY 81-8973 is Bayer’s new full-length recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product in development for the treatment of hemophilia A. BAY 81-8973 has no human- or animal- derived raw materials added to the cell culture, purification, or formulation processes.

Objective:

To evaluate the safety profile of BAY 81-8973 as documented in clinical trials with BAY 81-8973.

Methods:

The safety of BAY 81-8973 for prevention and treatment of bleeds in patients with severe hemophilia A (<1% FVIII) was evaluated in 3 clinical studies: 2 in adolescent and adult previously treated patients (PTPs; aged 12–65 years with ≥150 previous exposure days [EDs]) and 1 in pediatric PTPs (aged ≤12 years with ≥50 previous EDs). A total of 193 PTPs (including 51 pediatric patients) were included to assess the frequency of adverse reactions in the 3 phase 3 studies. The immunogenicity of BAY 81-8973 was also evaluated in PTPs. Adverse reactions were collected and analyzed throughout the studies.

Results:

The frequency, type, and severity of adverse reactions in children were similar to those in adults. Adverse reactions in PTPs are listed in Table 1. In PTPs evaluated to date for immunogenicity, no inhibitors were detected.

Table 1. Adverse Reactions in Previously Treated Patients (N=193)

Conclusions:

The incidence of treatment-related adverse and serious adverse reactions in the BAY 81-8973 trials was low (<10%) and similar to those reported in the literature for other full-length FVIII products. No PTP developed a FVIII inhibitor.

Objective:

TFPI is a potent inhibitor of the tissue factor (TF)-induced extrinsic pathway of coagulation. Inhibition of TFPI with antibodies, aptamers, or peptide inhibitors improves hemostasis and may become an option for non-i.v. treatment of patients with hemophilia including those with inhibitors.

Method:

We developed a TFPI inhibitory fusion peptide (FP) consisting of a linear and a cyclic peptide connected by an optimized linker. The two peptides bind to different epitopes on TFPI and synergistically inhibit TFPI. The FP was further improved by half-life extending (HL) non-covalent albumin binding. HL-FP was characterized for in vitro inhibition of TFPI, pharmacokinetics, and improvement of coagulation in animal models of hemophilia.

Results:

HL-FP bound to and efficiently inhibited TFPI in several in vitro test systems. The binding affinity of < 1nM correlated well with inhibition of TFPI in model assays, resulting in IC50s of ~0.7nM. HL-FP efficiently inhibited plasma TFPI, which improved all thrombin generation (TG) parameters in hemophilia A and B patient plasma (EC50s of 6 to 20nM). HL-FP increased peak thrombin levels of hemophilia plasma to a range established for individual normal plasma. Assays were also carried out at flTFPI concentrations up to 10nM, which is 40- to 50- fold above normal. Increased TFPI levels may occur locally upon platelet activation. HL-FP efficiently neutralized elevated TFPI, raising TG to levels observed for inhibition of physiologic TFPI concentrations. Non-covalent binding to albumin substantially increased the half-life to ~4 h with ~50% s.c. bioavailability in mice. The ex vivo procoagulant activity determined by TG correlated well with HL-FP plasma concentrations. In a repeated dose study, the HL-FP was well tolerated and did not accumulate TFPI, indicating that HL-FP did not interfere with TFPI clearance. HL-FP significantly reduced bleeding in the hemophilia mouse tail cut model at a dose as low as 40 nmol/kg. In marmoset monkeys, HL-FP efficiently improved ex vivo plasma TG, even at low peptide plasma concentrations (25-55nM).

Conclusion:

To summarize, we developed a TFPI inhibitor composed of two TFPI antagonistic peptides that completely inhibits TFPI. Introduction of an entity non-covalently binding to albumin provides intermediate half-life extension and s.c. bioavailability. This HL-FP improved coagulation and hemostasis in animal models of hemophilia, did not interfere with TFPI clearance receptor interactions, and efficiently neutralized elevated TFPI. Our HL-FP appears to be useful in preventing bleeding in hemophilia, and provides a FVIII and FIX independent approach for non-i.v. treatment.

Introduction:

BAY 81-8973 is Bayer’s new full-length recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product for the treatment of hemophilia A, with no human- or animal-derived raw materials added to the cell culture, purification, or formulation process.

Methods:

The safety and efficacy of BAY 81-8973 for routine prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A (<1% FVIII) was evaluated in 3 clinical studies: 2 in adolescent and adult previously treated patients (PTPs; aged 12–65 years [Study 1 and Study 2]) and 1 in children aged ≤12 years (PTPs: completed [Study 3]; previously untreated patients: ongoing), enrolling a total of 204 patients. In Study 1, the prophylaxis regimen was 20–50 IU/kg 2x–3x/wk as determined by the investigator. In Study 2, patients were randomized to prophylaxis (20–30 IU/kg 2x/wk or 30–40 IU/kg 3x/wk) or on-demand treatment. In both 12-month studies, the primary efficacy variable was the annualized bleeding rate (ABR). In Study 3, the prophylaxis regimen was 20–50 IU/kg 2x–3x/wk or every other day, as determined by the investigator, for ≥50 exposure days (approximately 6–8 months). The primary efficacy variable was the ABR for total bleeds occurring within 48 hours of previous prophylaxis treatment; ABR was also analyzed independent of time of injection.

Results:

A total of 193 patients treated with BAY 81-8973 were included in the analysis (Table 1). Sixteen (25.8%), 16 (27.1%), and 23 (45.1%) patients treated prophylactically had 0 bleeding episodes in Studies 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Table 1. Annualized Bleeding Rates

Conclusions:

Study 1 and Study 2 demonstrated the efficacy and safety of routine prophylaxis treatment with BAY 81-8973 in adolescents and adults. Study 2 also demonstrated the superiority of prophylaxis over on-demand treatment during a one-year treatment period. An additional study in children aged ≤12 years showed low annualized rates for all bleeds, joint bleeds, and spontaneous bleeds within 48 hours after injection or later during routine prophylaxis.

Introduction:

Efficacy and safety of routine prophylaxis vs on-demand treatment with Bayer’s sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII-FS) in patients with severe hemophilia A were evaluated in the randomized, controlled SPINART study.

Aim:

Patient- and joint-level changes at year 3 in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Colorado Adult Joint Assessment Scale (CAJAS) scores were compared to investigate if individual joint data revealed results that may have been obscured in previously reported patient-level analyses.

Methods:

SPINART included males aged 12–50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥150 exposure days to FVIII, no inhibitors, and no prophylaxis for >12 months in the past 5 years. Patients were randomized 1:1 to rFVIII-FS on demand or prophylaxis (25 IU/kg 3x/wk). Changes from baseline to year 3 were evaluated for 6 index joints (knees, ankles, elbows) using the Extended MRI (eMRI) scale and CAJAS. Percentages of patients or joints with improved, unchanged, or worsened scores were evaluated.

Summary:

Of the 84 patients in SPINART, eMRI and CAJAS change from baseline data were available for 62 (prophylaxis, n=32; on demand, n=30) and 76 patients (n=39; n=37) and for 386 (n=197; n=189) and 446 joints (n=224; n=222), respectively. Categoric analysis of CAJAS data at year 3 showed a higher percentage of patients treated prophylactically vs on demand with improved scores (64.1% vs 43.2%) and a lower percentage with worsened scores (28.2% vs 51.4%); with eMRI, the percentage improved was smaller (12.5% vs 6.7% improved; 75.0% vs 73.3% worsened). At individual joints, improved, unchanged, and worsened CAJAS scores in patients treated with prophylaxis vs on demand were 46.0% vs 33.3%, 22.3% vs 24.3%, and 31.7% vs 42.3%; eMRI values were 8.1% vs 3.7%, 61.9% vs 69.8%, and 29.9% vs 26.5%.

Conclusions:

These data suggest that in adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A, joint function as measured by CAJAS is more likely to improve after 3 years of routine prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS than joint structure as measured by MRI.

Introduction:

BAY 81-8973 is Bayer’s new full-length recombinant factor VIII product in development for the treatment of hemophilia A, with no human- or animal-derived raw materials added to the cell culture, purification, or formulation process. The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of BAY 81-8973 were investigated in 3 studies in previously treated adults, adolescents, and children.

Methods:

For all PK evaluations, a single dose of 50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 was injected. Serial blood samples were collected over 48 hours in adults and 24 hours in children <12 years of age. PK samples in adolescents and adults were analyzed using one-stage and chromogenic assays. Limited samples were collected in children and were analyzed using only the chromogenic assay. Ethnic subgroups included Chinese, Japanese, and non-Asian patients.

Results:

PK parameters using the chromogenic assay for children (aged <12 years), adolescents (aged 12–17 years), and adults (aged ≥18 years) are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Pharmacokinetic Parameters Based on the Chromogenic Assay

Conclusions:

Analysis of PK across the different age groups showed that the values for maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) for adolescents were within the range of those seen for adults. PK values were slightly lower in children than in adults. There were no significant differences among the ethnic groups studied.

Objective:

The ongoing rFIXFc extension study, B-YOND (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01425723), evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of rFIXFc for the treatment of severe hemophilia B. Here we report interim safety and efficacy data for adults and adolescents enrolled in B- YOND.

Methods:

Upon completing B-LONG, eligible subjects could enroll in one of 4 treatment groups in B-YOND: weekly prophylaxis (20 to 100 IU/kg every 7 days), individualized prophylaxis (100 IU/kg every 8 to 16 days, or twice monthly), modified prophylaxis (a prophylaxis regimen different from weekly or individualized prophylaxis), or episodic treatment. Subjects could change treatment groups at any point in the study. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors. Secondary outcomes included annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and rFIXFc exposure days (EDs).

Summary:

93/115 subjects (80.9%) who completed B-LONG enrolled in B-YOND. As of the interim data cut (17 October 2014), 18 subjects had completed, 7 had discontinued, and 68 remained on study (median time on study, 119.9 weeks). From the start of B-LONG to the B- YOND interim data cut, the median time on rFIXFc was 171.6 weeks and 68 subjects (73%) had ≥100 cumulative rFIXFc EDs. 29/90 subjects (32%) from Arms 1-3 of B-LONG changed treatment groups at the start of or during B-YOND, including 9/19 subjects who changed from episodic to prophylactic treatment (1 subject changed back to episodic treatment before the interim data cut). In the weekly prophylaxis group, the median (IQR) average weekly prophylactic dose was 49.5 (21.0, 105.6) IU/kg. The median (IQR) average dosing intervals in the individualized and modified prophylaxis groups were 13.7 (10.1, 14.0) days and 6.9 (4.9, 7.0) days, respectively (a reduction in annual infusions of ~75% and ~50%, respectively, compared with twice-weekly administration of a standard half-life FIX product). As of the B- YOND interim data cut, no inhibitors were observed, and there were no reports of anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity reactions associated with rFIXFc, and no thrombotic events. Adverse events were generally typical of the hemophilia B population; no subject discontinued due to an adverse event. Median ABRs were low with rFIXFc prophylaxis (Table). 97.2% of bleeding episodes were controlled with 1 or 2 infusions.

Conclusions:

Interim data from B- YOND confirm the long-term safety of rFIXFc and the maintenance of a low ABR with prophylactic dosing every 1 to 2 weeks.